EXPOSED: Over 150 Civilians In Yemen Killed By U.S. Military

The Young Turks

5,470 views • 20 hours ago Save 16 min 4 min read

Video Summary

The United States is facing a mounting civilian casualty crisis in Yemen, with at least 153 confirmed deaths and nearly 250 injuries resulting from a 50-day military campaign that targeted 1,000 locations. Critics argue that the loosening of rules of engagement—coupled with a shift toward targeting civilian infrastructure—has not only failed to diminish the Houthi arsenal but has actively united disparate factions against the U.S., mirroring failed strategies from past conflicts like Vietnam and Fallujah.

Experts suggest that this aggressive posture is symptomatic of an increasingly entangled political relationship with Israel, where the U.S. has begun adopting Israeli military methods. Despite the devastation, the cycle of violence continues, with analysts warning that such "wanton destruction" serves only to empower extremists and diminish the influence of moderates, ultimately undermining long-term stability and U.S. strategic interests in the region.

Short Highlights

The U.S. military campaign in Yemen resulted in at least 153 civilian deaths and nearly 250 injuries over 50 days.
Pentagon reviews have analyzed only three of the 18 total attacks, leaving 15 incidents pending investigation.
The strategy of targeting civilian infrastructure, such as schools and power grids, is criticized as a "black and white war crime" that fails to weaken foreign armies.
Experts argue that the U.S. is increasingly "Israelifying" its military operations, adopting aggressive tactics that prioritize force over diplomatic engagement.
Historical precedents, including the Vietnam War, demonstrate that relentless bombing does not break a nation's will to resist but instead fosters internal unity against the occupier.
The current policy of indiscriminate force is counterproductive, as it prevents moderate voices from rising to power and instead elevates extremist leadership.

Key Details

Escalating Civilian Toll [0:00]

New reports indicate that at least 153 civilians have been killed in U.S. strikes in Yemen, with Pentagon officials acknowledging the death toll may be higher.
The Pentagon has reviewed only three of the 18 attacks conducted during the 50-day campaign, leaving the majority of incidents unanalyzed.
"And now we realize that there's 150 civilians at a minimum that we killed in strikes in Yemen. And it looks like there might be a lot more."

The Failure of Infrastructure Attacks [1:16]

Critics argue that targeting civilian infrastructure like schools, hospitals, and desalination plants is a war crime that serves no tactical purpose.
Such attacks drive disparate local factions to unite against the U.S. rather than weakening the Houthi arsenal.
"You don't have to attack schools and hospitals and bridges and the electrical grid and desalination plants. That's what we're doing and that doesn't help you win the war."

Lessons from History [3:25]

Comparisons are drawn to the Vietnam War, where extensive bombing and chemical warfare failed to break the resistance of the population.
Experts note that modern conflicts, such as those in Fallujah or Dresden, prove that civilian casualties do not weaken foreign armies but rather harden their resolve.
"We bombed and bombed, and we did carpet bombing, we did Agent Orange, and we couldn't break their will to resist."

The Israelification of U.S. Policy [5:27]

There is growing concern that the U.S. is increasingly adopting Israeli military methods, which include the intentional targeting of civilians.
Intelligence officials have noted that the relationship has become so entangled that it is difficult for the U.S. to maintain independence, even as Israel ramps up espionage against the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency.
"I think the bottom line is our political, military, and intelligence relationship with Israel has grown so close and so strong that we're almost unable to break away from it now."

The Myth of 'Savagery' [7:44]

Media narratives that attribute regional conflict to inherent cultural or religious hatred are dismissed as inaccurate and dangerous.
Experts who have lived in the Middle East emphasize that the primary drivers of anti-American sentiment are military intervention and foreign policy decisions, not cultural differences.
"I spent a very good part of my adult life living in the Middle East. And literally none of that is true."

Diplomacy as the Only Path [9:19]

Analysts argue that the only way to resolve the crisis in the Red Sea is through direct diplomatic engagement rather than military escalation.
The current approach of doubling down on failed military tactics only ensures that extremist leaders continue to gain influence at the expense of potential moderates.
"We've got to sit across the table from them and ask them what we can do to make this right."