Menu
Why Qatar Funds American Universities?

Why Qatar Funds American Universities?

Valuetainment

20,865 views • 2 days ago Save 8 min 4 min read

Video Summary

A Polish politician argues that Western universities are being infiltrated by communist ideology, echoing Antonio Gramsci's strategy of "long march through the institutions." He contrasts this with the forceful methods of past dictatorships, suggesting a more insidious takeover is underway.

The politician highlights the overwhelming liberal bias in elite U.S. universities, citing data showing faculty overwhelmingly identify as Democrats. He also criticizes foreign funding of universities, particularly from Qatar, as a means to influence the next generation. He draws parallels between communist and jihadist ideologies, asserting that both seek to erode freedom, particularly freedom of speech, as exemplified by the banning of Tommy Robinson and his own exclusion from the UK.

Short Highlights

  • Antonio Gramsci's Strategy: The "long march through the institutions" aims to control culture and minds without overt force.
  • University Liberal Bias: Elite U.S. universities show overwhelming Democratic faculty, with Harvard at 99% and Princeton at 98%.
  • Foreign Funding Concerns: Billions from countries like Qatar are poured into universities to influence future generations.
  • Ideological Parallels: Communism, Sharia law, and fascism are seen as threats to freedom, especially freedom of speech.
  • Suppression of Dissent: The banning of speakers and activists like Tommy Robinson is cited as evidence of this suppression.

Key Details

Gramsci's Strategy: The "Long March Through the Institutions" [00:00:00]

  • Antonio Gramsci, imprisoned by Mussolini, developed a strategy to change society not through force, but by slowly infiltrating institutions.
  • This involves influencing teachers, students, industries, and culture, including Hollywood, to shift public opinion and "common sense."
  • "one is with the weapon, with a sword, the other is the slow, get into the institutions, go get the teachers, then get the kids, then send them to different industries, then win over culture, then get into Hollywood, and then get them defending you, and common sense goes away, because common sense becomes whatever you think is common sense, whatever you're selling."

The European Union Project and Spinelli's Vision [00:00:00]

  • Altero Spinelli, a communist jailed by fascists, is credited with initiating the European project with the goal of a borderless, unified Europe.
  • The speaker draws a controversial parallel between Spinelli's vision and Hitler's, arguing both sought a unified Europe devoid of national differences.
  • "So the whole idea, Spinelli's idea, was to have Europe as a one nation with no borders."

Foreign Influence in Universities: Qatar's Investment [00:00:00]

  • The speaker highlights the significant financial investment by Qatar in Western universities, amounting to billions of dollars.
  • This funding is seen not just as an educational investment, but as a strategic move to influence the minds of the next generation.
  • "Do you know how much money Qatar spends on universities? 300 million dollars every quarter."

The Ideological Landscape of Elite U.S. Universities [00:00:00]

  • Data reveals an overwhelming majority of faculty at elite U.S. universities identify as Democrats, with some institutions showing 99% liberal bias.
  • This ideological dominance is presented as evidence of Gramsci's strategy succeeding, creating a monoculture where debate is stifled.
  • "Look at Harvard 99% Democrats. That's right. One percent is Republican, Princeton 98, Yale 97, Berkeley 97, Columbia 96, Brown 96, Hopkins 95, Duke 95, Cornell 95, Caltech 93, Stanford 91, Dartmouth 91, Penn 90, and then UCLA is at 89%."

Freedom of Speech Under Threat: The Cases of Robinson and the Speaker [00:00:00]

  • The speaker argues that communism's primary target is freedom of speech, drawing parallels with jihadist ideologies.
  • He cites the sentencing of Tommy Robinson and his own ban from entering the UK as examples of dissent being suppressed.
  • "So I was on my diplomatic passport. I was banned from entering the country to give a speech. It's ridiculous."

Other People Also See