An Open Letter To Erika Kirk | Candace Ep 303

Erica Kirk's Plea for Transparency and Accusations of Deception [0:09]

• Erica Kirk's public plea for transparency regarding her husband Charlie Kirk's death on Fox News is met with skepticism.
• The speaker questions Kirk's sincerity, suggesting her statements are rehearsed and lack genuine emotion.
• The argument is made that transparency could have been provided by Turning Point USA directly, rather than through court proceedings, as TPUSA had access to 4K footage of the incident.
• TPUSA is accused of being "kooky" and changing information, implying a deliberate attempt to obscure the truth.

"making this public plea to the courts, I don't know. I think that it stands in stark contrast to the actions um that are available to Erica Kirk as the CEO and chairman of this massive organization."

The Disagreement Leading to Resignation and the "Charlie and I Lied About Money" Incident [04:02]

• The speaker details a personal disagreement with Charlie Kirk in 2019, which fractured trust and led to her resignation as Communications Director of TPUSA.
• The media's speculation about anti-semitism or disagreements over Kanye West is dismissed as untrue.
• The core issue was Charlie Kirk lying about a fundraising meeting at Mar-a-Lago with "Ike Promoter," which he attempted to conceal.
• The discovery of this lie occurred during an elevator ride, leading to Charlie's visible distress and an attempted apology.

"Charlie had taken a meeting down in Florida with Ike Promoter at Mara Lago. It was a a fundraising meeting. For whatever reason, he did not want me to know about this meeting and that was strange."

Warnings About Bad Influences and Suspicions of Foul Play [07:05]

• The speaker reveals warning Charlie Kirk about individuals like Stacy Sheridan and Dan Flood from Schaefer Security, suspecting they had ulterior motives.
• A profound realization is shared: Erica Kirk may have been the "newest and biggest influence" in Charlie's life, and her alleged lies to the speaker are contrasted with Charlie's perceived naivety.
• The speaker explicitly states that Erica Kirk's lies were not due to naivety or being misled but were authorized, implying deliberate malicious intent.
• The speaker believes Erica Kirk blessed the "evil things" done to her and authorized the use of significant money to attack someone grieving her husband.

"But you didn't do it um when you lie. You didn't do it out of naivity. You didn't do it because you were young and being pulled into the wrong direction by bad faith actors."

The Billion-Dollar Deal with Pierre and Suspicions of Foreign Involvement [13:09]

• Verifiable proof is presented that Justin Strife and Erica Kirk lied about knowing "Pierre," a French individual involved in a potential deal worth billions of dollars with Turning Point USA shortly after Charlie Kirk was shot.
• Pierre allegedly had phone calls with Justin Strife and Don Oro of TPUSA and reportedly knew about Charlie Kirk's death before the public did, despite not yet being a donor.
• The speaker questions why a devout Catholic Frenchman would offer billions to an evangelical organization and suggests a "French angle" or financial motive for the assassination.
• The possibility of this deal being the reason the White House did not respond to inquiries about the French Foreign Legion's involvement is raised.

"The truth is that there was a deal on the table with Pierre who yes is from France born in France and that deal was worth billions not millions billions plural billions of dollars"

The Netanyahu Connection and the "Psychological Operation" Theory [16:30]

• The speaker theorizes that Erica Kirk was lying to cover for Bibi Netanyahu, referencing a meeting where Netanyahu allegedly offered to elevate Turning Point USA, which Charlie Kirk reportedly turned down.
• This is framed as a "full-blown SCOP, psychological operation" designed to psychologically break the speaker.
• The motive is suggested to be that something significant happened in the Hamptons meeting that caused panic, leading to Charlie Kirk saying "no" to Netanyahu and declining to have him on his podcast.
• The exchange for Netanyahu's offer to "take Turning Point USA to the next level" remains a central question, especially considering TPUSA's existing valuation of $100 million and $100 million annual revenue.

"Why would a devout Catholic Frenchman be looking to give billions of dollars to an evangelical organization? Is that not weird? Just objectively weird?"

Questioning Erica Kirk's Whereabouts and the "Loyalty Test" at TPUSA [19:13]

• Evidence is presented that strongly disputes Erica Kirk's claimed whereabouts on the morning of September 10th, suggesting she lied about accompanying her mother for treatment.
• The speaker questions why TPUSA is struggling to maintain a consistent story and highlights inconsistencies in Kirk's accounts, such as her interaction with Jesse Waters.
• A former TPUSA public relations manager, Aubrey Lech, describes being fired after an Uber driver recounted his daughter's negative comments about the organization and Erica Kirk.
• Lech states she was terminated for questioning the narrative of Charlie Kirk's assassination and the direction of the company under Erica Kirk, deeming it a "loyalty test."

"The story was presented to me as one of the reasons for my termination. Turning Point has not insinuated this. They never told me anything like this."

The "Purge Fallout Fund" and the Mistreatment of Fired Employees [35:10]

• The video highlights a GoFundMe campaign called "The Purge Fallout Fund" to support eight former TPUSA employees who were fired without adequate reason after working tirelessly through the trauma of Charlie Kirk's death and enduring 20-hour workdays.
• The speaker expresses outrage that these employees, who contributed to TPUSA earning $250 million, are now on GoFundMe, calling the situation "evil."
• It's revealed that one fired employee's fiancé was also terminated, wiping out their household income in a single day without explanation.
• The speaker urges viewers to donate to the fund, emphasizing the employees' suffering and mistreatment.

"It's it's just so evil. It's also evil that we're gonna have to donate. It's us. Everybody, if you got a dollar to support these employees who were traumatized and watching uh their employer die, got zero days off, then had to work 20our days through to the end of the year through to Amfest and then got fired without a reason."

The Speaker's Investigation, Beliefs, and Audience Engagement [39:10]

• The speaker expresses confidence in finding out what happened, stating, "This is not going to be a never-ending mystery. This is not going to be the JFK story."
• The belief is reiterated that France and Israel are involved in Charlie Kirk's assassination, citing the "Egyptian planes" and the "Korean angle" as further puzzling elements.
• The speaker dismisses the idea that the media's focus on leftist criticism or a "Jezebel article" caused Charlie Kirk's distress, insisting it was a premonition of death.
• The video concludes by thanking the audience for their support and engagement, emphasizing collective effort in piecing together the truth, and framing the situation as a battle against "biblical evil" and a "satanic cult."

"I'm going to find out. This is not going to be a never-ending mystery. This is not going to be the JFK story. I'm going to figure out exactly what happened and I'm getting very close against all odds, against billions. You might have the billions, but I have the truth."