JORDAN PETERSON IS F*CKED | The Kyle Kulinski Show

The Perceived Decline of Jordan Peterson [00:00]

• A viral video featuring Jordan Peterson being "cooked" by young atheists is discussed.
• The speaker characterizes Peterson as a "bullshitter" and "sophist" whose charisma once masked a lack of substance.
• Peterson's decline is linked to a period of addiction and a controversial treatment in Russia.
• The video's participants are described as "wiping the floor" with Peterson, calling him "sundowning."
• Peterson's refusal to state he is Christian in a video initially titled "One Christian Versus 20 Atheists" is highlighted as a point of contention.
• Jubilee, the production company, was forced to change the video title to "Jordan Peterson Versus 20 Atheists" due to backlash.
• Peterson is described as having a "meltdown" and being psychologically unwell.

He's always been a bullshitter. He's always been a sophist. He's always talked a lot without saying anything.

Critiquing Biblical Defense and Religious Thinking [00:00]

• A clip features a participant questioning the justification for the biblical command to slaughter the Amalekites, including infants.
• Peterson's response is described as being unable to provide a justification, stating he "doesn't know what to do with the terrible blood soaked saturated history of the human past."
• The speaker criticizes Peterson's facial expression during his response as weak and desperate.
• The debate highlights a core problem with religious thinking: the difficulty in defending objectively horrible biblical passages.
• The speaker argues that if one claims a book is holy and has all the answers, they should be able to defend its contents, rather than simply saying "Oh, I don't know."
• The argument is made that basing one's worldview on a book that contains commands to be brutal, immoral, or evil is a bad idea.
• The speaker notes that many religious individuals base their lives on the positive aspects of their holy books and are functionally good people, but asserts it is more logical to do the right thing for its own sake.
• The idea of moral intuition being more accurate than ancient holy books is proposed, suggesting a strive for progress and betterment beyond past atrocities.

Look, I already said that it's very difficult to look at blood soap past and to know exactly what to do about it.

The Need for Directness and the "Era of Bluntness" [00:00]

• Peterson's inability to be direct, straightforward, and simply state what he thinks is identified as his main problem, as his views are not defensible.
• He is accused of using "smokescreen of deflections and obfiscations" to avoid direct answers.
• The speaker foresees a potential revival of atheism online, similar to the "new atheist movement."
• This past movement is described as a "breath of fresh air" during a time when religious fundamentalism influenced government.
• The current situation is seen as proof that Peterson is "washed" and that atheists had valid points.
• The speaker asserts that basing one's philosophy on a book with contradictory commands, ranging from peace to genocide, is illogical.
• The ability to unequivocally condemn horrific biblical stories, such as genocide and killing infants, is presented as a benchmark for intellectual honesty.
• The speaker suggests that those who cannot directly condemn such acts are "chief bullshit artists."

And so the point effectively that the atheist guy is making is like, I don't know, man. It seems like a pretty bad idea to base your world view around a book where at least half the time the commands are to be a worse person, to be brutal, to be immoral, to be evil, to slaughter infants.

Backstory: The "One Christian vs. 20 Atheists" Debate and Peterson's Ambiguity [00:00]

• A participant in the debate provides background on the production, stating that invitations were initially for "One Christian versus 20 or 25 Atheists."
• Peterson reportedly giggled and said some people don't consider him a Christian, yet embraced the label before filming.
• This is compared to a "Joe Biden moment," suggesting a lack of understanding of the implications of his statements.
• If Peterson doesn't label himself as a Christian, he should have declined participation.
• The issue of "Mary worship" is mentioned as something Peterson brought up, but the speaker clarifies he was "owned" for accepting the "one Christian" label and then refusing to commit to it during the production.
• Jubilee changed the title to "Jordan Peterson Versus 20 Atheists" after public backlash for inviting someone who is "barely a Christian, if not even."
• The speaker believes Peterson knew the original title and agreed to it, but felt pressured to back off his claim of being a Christian due to his inability to defend it.
• Peterson's ambiguous responses to questions about the resurrection ("maybe it happened, maybe it didn't") and what it means to be a Christian are criticized as evasive.
• The speaker contrasts his own assertive approach with the interviewer's politeness, stating he is "tired of the BS."
• The use of a hypothetical video camera scenario to question the resurrection is presented as a way to illustrate the lack of directness.
• Peterson is blamed for the situation, with Jubilee suffering because he accepted the gig without clear convictions.

I think that was communicated to him perfectly. I think he agreed to it. But I think you guys did such a good job pummeling him into dust in this debate that he felt like, look, I got to back off the just the broad claim of I'm a Christian because I can't really defend it, right?

The "Vibes Have Shifted" and the Fall of the Right-Wing Era [00:00]

• The speaker declares that "the vibes have shifted" and that the "right-wing era" is "over."
• Sam Seder's performance in a Jubilee debate against MAGA Republicans, where he "annihilated them," is cited as an example of this shift.
• Even Republicans were sharing clips of Seder, mistakenly believing he was a right-winger who "owned" lefties.
• The current political situation where Republicans hold the presidency, House, and Senate is described as leading to objectively worsening conditions for people.
• In contrast to Seder's success, Jordan Peterson is said to have "eaten a bag of dicks" on Jubilee.
• The speaker praises the sharp, quick, and most importantly, direct atheists in Peterson's debate.
• The current era is declared the "era of bluntness," where people should "say what the [expletive] you believe and stand on it."
• The speaker criticizes the inconsistency of politicians, using Trump as an example of saying one thing and doing the opposite, and still maintaining support.
• Trump is characterized by corruption, insanity, and psychopathy.
• Jordan Peterson is positioned as the "bullshit saint" who cannot be blunt or straightforward because his life is about "bullshitting everybody."
• The era of the charlatan is declared over, replaced by the era of bluntness and straightforwardness.
• The speaker contrasts the universally negative reception of Peterson's Jubilee video with the positive reception of Sam Seder's.
• The video concludes with a call to action against "Ben Shapiro, Jordan Peterson, and Trumpism," declaring "We're back, baby. We're back and we're not [expletive] stopping."

The vibes have immensely shifted, y'all. Trump is on on the downswing at the moment. He is collapsing online.

Bro, that's what happened. And I I love not only this kid, but I love all the other atheists who did the debate because they all were so sharp, so quick, but most importantly, so direct.