Situational Awareness' 439% Return Was the Warning

Bloomberg Television

1,046 views • 9 hours ago Save 5 min 4 min read

Video Summary

A hedge fund's near-collapse highlights the perilous math of risk, revealing how excessive leverage can turn even brilliant investment theses into disaster. John Kelly's 1956 discovery at Bell Labs established that beyond a certain point, increasing risk doesn't boost potential gains but dramatically heightens the probability of ruin. This principle appears to have been ignored by the firm Situational Awareness, which, despite a $10 billion valuation, reportedly lost significant investor capital by taking on excessive leverage, particularly in AI-related assets.

While the firm's stated goal was to capitalize on the AI boom, its public statements focused solely on expected returns, neglecting risk management. This oversight, coupled with a complex web of long and short positions and options, suggests a dangerous disregard for survival. In contrast, institutions like Citadel, with robust risk management, were able to capitalize on the situation, demonstrating the critical importance of understanding and respecting the "Kelly limit" to ensure long-term viability in volatile markets.

Short Highlights

John Kelly's 1956 discovery: Taking excessive risk increases the probability of bad outcomes, not good ones.
The "Kelly limit" suggests optimal growth occurs halfway to the "cliff" of ruin.
Situational Awareness fund reportedly ignored risk management, leading to potential investor losses.
Leveraged ETFs and some retail investors in South Korea also faced significant losses.
Citadel, with strong risk management, was able to profit from the situation.
AI investments require long-term vision and survival, not unlimited risk.
Banks lending money generally protected themselves, unlike the Archegos situation.

Key Details

The Perilous Math of Risk [0:10]

John Kelly, a physicist at Bell Labs in 1956, discovered that risk has a speed limit for compounding portfolios.
Beyond a certain point, increasing risk only increases the probability of very bad outcomes.
"most people assume that taking more risk means you increase the possibility of very good and very bad outcomes but what he discovered is there's a limit and beyond that all you do is increase the probability of very bad outcomes"

The Kelly Limit and Optimal Growth [0:48]

The optimal strategy, according to Kelly's work, is to go halfway to the risk limit, achieving maximum growth.
Exceeding this limit, even with partial information, means the probability of a catastrophic failure, or "blowing up," is high.
"the optimum is half of the kelly limit you know you go halfway to the cliff and that's where you get your maximum growth"

Situational Awareness: A Case Study in Risk [1:14]

The Situational Awareness fund, despite a $10 billion valuation, appears to have significantly overleveraged its positions, particularly in AI.
Public statements from the fund focused only on expected returns, neglecting any mention of risk.
"it just not does not seem like a risk managed portfolio and all of the public statements we've heard from them only mention expected return you know future outcomes none of it — mentions risk"

Understanding the Losses [2:21]

While the fund's total valuation is $10 billion, this figure may be misleading, with significant holdings like Anthropic potentially not marked down.
Many investors who entered closer to the peak are likely underwater, despite the fund's overall size.
"i suspect most of the investors in — sa on a dollar basis have lost quite a bit of money if you were in january you know if you were part of that 1.5 billion you're still up i think 30 for the year"

Banks and Risk Management Lessons [3:36]

Banks that lent money to Situational Awareness generally protected themselves, unlike the Archegos situation, by assessing market liquidity for potential buyers.
Institutions like Citadel, known for their robust risk management, were able to step in and profit from the situation.
"the banks always — should do okay and what they were looking at is they were looking at the market for this stock they were they knew citadel was around they knew there were other people around who would you know be in a position to buy on a dip and they quickly got out"

AI Trade and Sensible Investing [5:27]

The AI trade is not necessarily a "canary in the coal mine" for a broader market collapse.
Disasters in AI have primarily affected those who were overleveraged, not long-term, sensible investors.
"you had to expect i mean i mean these stocks are extremely volatile and the events of the summer have been you know pretty much normal volatility for this sector"