Menu
Hasan Piker To SUE Scott Jennings Over Egregious Smear

Hasan Piker To SUE Scott Jennings Over Egregious Smear

Breaking Points

14,411 views 18 hours ago Save 9 min 7 min read

Video Summary

A CNN commentator's use of selectively edited clips to portray streamer Hasan Piker as racist has sparked outrage and a potential defamation lawsuit. Piker's allies argue that the clips, which allegedly twist his sarcastic remarks to suggest he supports lynching Black people, are a malicious misrepresentation. They contend that Piker's actual political stances are deeply committed to equality and anti-racism, and that these tactics are a cynical attempt to demonize him.

The controversy highlights a broader issue of media manipulation and the use of "dark woke" or sarcastic humor being taken out of context. Critics of the tactic emphasize that fabricating such dangerous claims, especially regarding race, crosses a line beyond good-faith debate and is a "monstrous" and "evil" act. The situation also raises questions about the motivations of centrist Democrats and their potential alliance with conservative media in attacking progressive figures.

Short Highlights

  • Defamation Allegations: Scott Jennings, a CNN commentator, is accused of defamation for using out-of-context clips of streamer Hasan Piker.
  • Misrepresentation of Piker's Views: The clips allegedly twist Piker's sarcastic remarks to falsely suggest he supports lynching Black people and is racist.
  • Piker's Defense: Allies argue Piker's actual political stance is anti-racist and committed to equality, and that the clips are a deliberate misrepresentation.
  • **

Key Details

"Wokeness" Comes for Scott Jennings [0:00]

  • The segment begins by discussing CNN commentator Scott Jennings and his commentary on Abdul El-Sayed and African Americans.
  • Jennings is described as "the number one blue-haired wokester on the CNN panels."
  • "uh wokeness has come for scott jenning uh scott jenning the number one blue-haired uh wokester on the cnn panels has a lot to say about abdul el-sayed"

Hasan Piker's "Best Friend" [0:17]

  • The discussion shifts to streamer Hasan Piker, described as Abdul El-Sayed's "best friend."
  • Clips are presented where Piker appears to dismiss the concerns of Black people and makes controversial statements.
  • "now he's abdul el-sayed's best friend and he campaigns for and african americans out there within the sound of my voice need to listen up and you must listen carefully"

Out-of-Context Clips and Defamation [1:05]

  • The speaker argues that clipping people out of context is "one of the most evil things that you can do on the internet."
  • It's suggested that an "idiot at a Republican opposition research firm" provided these clips to Scott Jennings.
  • "secondly clipping people out of context is one of the most evil things that you can do on the internet and also for your own cause by the way"

Malicious Misrepresentation [2:00]

  • The argument is made that the intent is not to accurately represent Piker but to create a "boogeyman."
  • It's deemed "insane" and "monstrous" to suggest Piker wants Black people to be lynched, given his commitment to equality and human rights.
  • "you think hassan piker wants black people to be lynched that is insane and that is a monstrous thing to say about someone especially someone whose entire politics are deeply committed to equality and to human rights and to anti-racism"

The "Piker Plan" and Democratic Primaries [3:26]

  • The transcript touches on Democratic primaries, suggesting Black voters often vote against socialists but are overruled by "young privileged white commies."
  • A sarcastic reference is made to the "Piker plan of returning our country to lynchings."
  • "and if you look at these democratic primaries black voters have been voting against the socialists only to be overruled in many cases by young privileged white commies"

Michael La Rosa's Tirade [7:18]

  • Jill Biden's ex-staffer Michael La Rosa is introduced as continuing a tirade against El-Sayed and tangentially Hasan Piker.
  • La Rosa expresses a desire for Democrats to win the Senate and House without El-Sayed.
  • "i want the democrats to win i think they're going to win the senate i think they're going to win the house i want chuck schumer and brian schatz to be the next majority leaders"

La Rosa's Clients and Motivation [8:34]

  • La Rosa is noted to be working as a consultant for a Trump-friendly firm whose clients include Saudi Arabia and a warlord in Libya.
  • It's suggested that La Rosa's "rampage" is motivated by losing a significant TikTok contract.
  • "and then also you know i think we have we can't neglect to mention who la rosa is currently working for ryan isn't he currently working as a consultant for a trump friendly gentleman"

The Math Question: Senate Without El-Sayed [9:45]

  • La Rosa's statement about taking the Senate without El-Sayed is framed as a "math question."
  • The response suggests it's "highly unlikely" for Democrats to win the Senate without Abdul El-Sayed winning in Michigan.
  • "what's the math like on that where we take the senate but we don't have abdul in the senate just as it is theoretically possible for a woman to be good at math it is also theoretically possible for democrats to win the senate without abdul winning michigan long and highly unlikely yes"

Defamation Standards and Cynicism [10:54]

  • The discussion returns to the legal standards for defamation, distinguishing between hyperbole and factual claims.
  • Jennings is accused of making a "factual assertion that is factually untrue and it is demonstrably untrue."
  • "to me jennings is making a factual claim here he does at the end he makes a factual claim about lynchings he's making a factual assertion that is factually untrue and it is demonstrably untrue"

Double Standards in Media [12:40]

  • A double standard is highlighted where supporters of Israel can say anything about critics, while the other side faces scrutiny for truth.
  • Scott Jennings' employer is mentioned as having a chief strategy officer who is a registered agent for the Israeli government.
  • "we have two standards for what's allowable in conversation if you are supportive of israel in general you can say whatever you want about people who are critics of israel"

Undermining Credibility [13:53]

  • Scott Jennings' actions are seen as undermining his credibility, especially if he aims to criticize corporate media.
  • The argument is made that he is doing the "exact same thing" he criticizes others for, but in a "cynical" way.
  • "and that's again why it's also important for people on the right to understand what hassan piker does which is reject a lot of the woke pieties that were foisted by in some cases the hillary clintons of the world onto the left"

A Call for Unity Against Smears [15:31]

  • The speaker addresses liberals who might be happy about the attacks on Piker, warning they are "delusional" if they think the right views them differently.
  • The tactic of smearing opponents is presented as dangerous and corrosive to public debate, regardless of political affiliation.
  • "if you think the right views you any differently you are so delusional they think you're all communist they think you're all socialist they think you're all most importantly obstacles to their own power"

Independent Media Support [16:40]

  • The segment concludes with a call to action to like the video, leave a comment, and sign up for the full show at breakingpoints.com to support independent media.
  • "if you like that video hit the like button or leave a comment below it really helps get the show to more people and if you'd like to get the full show ad free and in your inbox every morning you can sign up at breakingpoints.com"

Other People Also See