‘We are actually talking about a war’ if U.S. invades Greenland: Danish MP
NBC News
5,764 views • 4 hours ago
Video Summary
The video discusses the implications of President Trump's desire to purchase Greenland from Denmark, a proposal met with firm rejection from Denmark's Defense Committee Chairman, Rasmus Yarlov. Yarlov emphasizes that Greenland is a self-governing region of Denmark with citizens who do not wish to become Americans, comparing the situation to the US being asked to cede Alaska or Hawaii. He stresses that Denmark cannot "sell off people" and views the proposal as a violation of sovereignty and a step backward from modern principles. The core of the issue is that the United States already enjoys extensive military access and cooperation in Greenland, making a purchase offer illogical and potentially damaging to the long-standing alliance between the two nations.
The Danish perspective highlights the absurdity of the situation, noting that the US already has full military access to Greenland, including existing bases and infrastructure that can be scaled up. Yarlov points out that Greenlanders wish to govern themselves and maintain their relationship with Denmark, rather than be "owned" by another nation. The economic threats, such as tariffs, are dismissed as ineffective against Denmark's unwavering stance, which is rooted in principle rather than financial considerations. This situation reveals a significant disconnect between the US administration's approach and the values of its allies, potentially jeopardizing decades of partnership.
One highly interesting fact is that Denmark spends over 3% of its defense budget, matching US spending, and is a leading contributor to the fight against Russia in Ukraine, underscoring its commitment as an ally.
Short Highlights
- Denmark cannot "hand over Greenland" or "sell off people" to the United States, as Greenland is a self-governing region with citizens who do not wish to become American.
- The US already has complete military access to Greenland, with the ability to expand bases and infrastructure, rendering a purchase offer illogical.
- Denmark is prepared to defend Greenland and does not want to engage in military confrontation with the US, which would be a "disaster."
- Economic threats, such as tariffs, are dismissed by Denmark, as their stance is based on principle, not money.
- Denmark has been a loyal ally of the US for 250 years and is a leading contributor to the fight against Russia in Ukraine, spending over 3% of its defense budget.
Key Details
Greenland's Sovereignty and Inalienable Rights [00:14]
- Greenland is a self-governing region of Denmark, and its citizens explicitly do not wish to become part of the United States or be governed by it.
- Denmark views the proposal to purchase Greenland as akin to the US being asked to hand over Alaska or Hawaii to another country, an act they deem impossible.
- The idea of "selling off people" is compared to practices from the 1800s, which is no longer acceptable, and Denmark feels a duty to protect its citizens.
- Denmark wishes to maintain good terms with the United States, emphasizing their long-standing alliance and friendship throughout US history.
- Despite the pressure, Denmark cannot yield to a demand to hand over part of its country.
"We can't just, you know, sell off people like we're in the 1800s. We don't do that anymore and we have to protect them."
Denmark's Defense of Greenland and Arctic Presence [01:52]
- Denmark does not wish to use military force in this situation but actively defends Greenland against external threats, primarily from Russia in the Arctic.
- Both China and Russia have been effectively kept out of Greenland, with no significant activities, control, or ownership in the region.
- The US can be assured that Denmark will continue to prevent foreign powers from gaining a foothold in Greenland.
- A hypothetical scenario of Russia or China attempting to take over Greenland would prompt Denmark to seek assistance, but this is not the current situation.
- A military confrontation with the United States would be a "disaster" for Denmark, acknowledging the significant size difference and military disparity.
"And if we were afraid that China or Russia were about to take over Greenland, we would call for help. But that's not the situation."
US Military Access and Economic Rationale [03:43]
- Denmark hopes to discuss with the US what specific benefits they believe they would gain from Greenland that they do not already possess.
- The United States already enjoys complete and full military access to Greenland, having previously maintained around 30 bases and 15,000 soldiers.
- Current US military presence focuses on a single base monitoring missile launches from Russia in case of nuclear attack.
- Denmark is open to the US expanding its military presence, including re-occupying existing bases and facilities.
- The offer extends to potential US mining projects, with Denmark willing to discuss such opportunities, but not at the cost of sovereignty.
"Because the thing is that the United States already has complete and full military access to Greenland."
Danish Perspective on US Actions and Alliance Values [05:02]
- US lawmakers have expressed concern, and Danish members of parliament have been approached, but no specific promises were made regarding congressional restraint on the President.
- Denmark hopes the American public and Congress will reconsider the proposal, as the current actions are unrecognizable to them.
- The proposal challenges the perception of the US as a nation that does not subjugate people or govern in an imperialistic style.
- Denmark has been a loyal friend to the US for 250 years and views the threat of military invasion as strange and unexpected.
- The historical partnership includes Denmark's significant contribution after 9/11, with a higher per capita casualty rate than many other nations.
"And US isn't a country that goes out to subjugate people and take away their freedom and try to sort of govern them in in an imperialistic style."
Economic Repercussions and Danish Principles [06:44]
- Denmark's economy would not be significantly affected by potential US tariffs, and their position on Greenland would not change regardless of economic pressure.
- Denmark states they will not sell Greenland "at any price," emphasizing that the issue is not financial.
- The principle of self-governance is paramount, with Greenlanders being the ones to run their society.
- Greenlanders choose to remain with Denmark and do not wish to be replaced by a nation that would "own them" and take away their freedom or dreams of independence.
- Denmark contributes significantly to defense, exceeding 3% of its GDP, matching US spending, and is a leading contributor to the fight against Russia in Ukraine.
"This is not for us a matter of money. Uh we're not going to sell green and at any price and it also means it doesn't matter uh if tariffs or any other economic uh pressure is put on us."
Other People Also See