Menu
How Much Can You Safely Withdraw in Early Retirement? | Christine Benz

How Much Can You Safely Withdraw in Early Retirement? | Christine Benz

BiggerPockets Money

241 views • 22 hours ago Save 36 min 10 min read

Video Summary

Christine Benz, director of personal finance at Morningstar, advocates for "good enough investing" rather than striving for unattainable perfection in retirement planning. She argues that focusing on "good enough" strategies, which include building in a margin of safety and accepting a "satisficer" mindset, can lead to greater financial independence and less anxiety.

Benz emphasizes that current market conditions, including valuations and yields, should inform retirement withdrawal strategies. While acknowledging the appeal of a 100% success rate, she warns that it often leads to significantly underspending during retirement. Instead, she suggests flexible spending systems, like the guardrails approach, which allow for adjustments based on portfolio performance, ultimately enabling higher sustainable withdrawal rates. The core message is to ground retirement plans in realistic assumptions and build in flexibility to navigate market uncertainties.

Short Highlights

  • Embrace "Good Enough" Investing: Striving for perfection in retirement planning can lead to anxiety and missed opportunities; a "satisficer" mindset that accepts "good enough" is more effective.
  • Valuations Matter: Current market valuations and yields should inform retirement withdrawal assumptions, not just historical data.
  • Flexible Spending is Key: Adapting spending based on market performance (e.g., reducing withdrawals in down markets) allows for higher sustainable withdrawal rates than fixed plans.
  • The 90% Success Rate: Morningstar's base case uses a 90% success rate, suggesting withdrawal rates of 3.9% for 30 years, 3.5% for 35 years, and 3.3% for 40+ years.
  • Guardrails Approach: This flexible system allows for higher initial withdrawals but requires more frequent adjustments based on portfolio performance.
  • Indexing as a Strategy: Indexing is presented as a "good enough" and strong investment strategy, providing above-average odds of success without excessive optimization.
  • Time is the Ultimate Asset: Prioritize time allocation on Earth over obsessing over minor investment optimizations, as time is the one resource that cannot be bought.

Key Details

The Problem with Perfection [00:00:00]

  • Many individuals, particularly in the FIRE community, obsess over achieving a "perfect" retirement portfolio and withdrawal strategy.
  • This pursuit of perfection can lead to analysis paralysis, delaying retirement indefinitely.
  • The concept of "good enough" investing, championed by Christine Benz, offers a more realistic and less stressful approach.

    "Good is the enemy of perfection? Yes, perfect is the enemy of the good, or something like that."

Morningstar's Base Case Withdrawal Rates [00:01:10]

  • Morningstar's research incorporates forward-looking capital market assumptions, not just historical data.
  • Their base case suggests a 3.9% withdrawal rate for 30-year retirements, 3.5% for 35 years, and 3.3% for 40 years.
  • These rates are conservative due to current market valuations and expectations of potentially lower equity returns in the near future.

    "And so you're right. The numbers are a little bit conservative relative to, say, the 4% guideline that people may have heard about."

Flexible Spending Systems [00:03:15]

  • Flexible spending strategies allow retirees to adjust their withdrawals based on portfolio performance.
  • This can significantly increase the sustainable withdrawal rate over a lifetime compared to a fixed, inflation-adjusted plan.
  • Examples include simply forgoing an inflation adjustment after a down year or more complex systems like guardrails.

    "So if you are able to flex a little bit with how your portfolio performs and how the markets behave, that redounds to the benefit of your plan."

Revisiting Your Financial Picture Annually [00:04:30]

  • Retirees should review their financial situation and portfolio performance at least annually.
  • Even simple adjustments, like not taking an inflation raise after a portfolio loss, can improve plan longevity.
  • The frequency of adjustments depends on the retiree's willingness to make course corrections and their budget flexibility.

    "Yeah, I think it's something, Mindy, that people should revisit annually, take a look at how your portfolio is performed."

Flexible Spending vs. Base Case Withdrawal Rates [00:06:40]

  • While the base case for a 40-year horizon is 3.3%, flexible spending systems can significantly increase this.
  • For a 30-year horizon, a guardrails-type system could allow for starting withdrawal rates in the upper 5% range.
  • Longer time horizons would still benefit from flexible spending but likely result in lower rates than shorter ones.

    "I do know that for a 30 year time horizon and we tend to do most of our research on, you know, sort of using that 30 year time horizon, traditional retirement time horizon."

Key Factors in Decumulation Debate [00:07:45]

  • The divergence in decumulation research often stems from six key questions:
    • Historical data used for projections.
    • Definition of "safe" (e.g., acceptable failure rate).
    • Spending strategy (static vs. flexible).
    • Portfolio asset allocation.
    • Inclusion of valuation conditioning.
    • Consideration of taxes and fees.

      "So first is what history are you using to project your future returns and why did you cut, slice the data set there, right?"

Valuations and Forward-Looking Assumptions [00:10:00]

  • Morningstar's approach incorporates current market conditions, including equity valuations and fixed income yields.
  • This contrasts with purely backward-looking historical analysis.
  • Starting conditions are crucial; high inflation and rising rates in late 2021 signaled a need for caution.

    "And I think back to when we initially began to work on this research using these forward-looking return assumptions."

Portfolio Construction and Valuations [00:13:00]

  • Forward-looking assumptions can influence portfolio construction, potentially leading to lighter equity weightings if returns are expected to be lower.
  • Higher bond yields may suggest increasing fixed-income allocations.
  • A blended approach, such as a TIPS ladder combined with an equity portfolio, can address both income needs and growth potential.

    "And I remember saying, wait, go back and redo that because that can't be right."

The Role of Bonds and TIPS [00:15:30]

  • Rising bond yields make fixed-income investments more attractive for those nearing retirement.
  • Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) are recommended to hedge against inflation risk.
  • While TIPS ladders can provide a safe income stream, they are self-liquidating and may not be sufficient alone.

    "So tips, I think, are an attractive way to defend against that inflation risk, treasury inflation protected securities?"

Portfolio Makeup for Retirees [00:17:30]

  • Morningstar's base case, with static spending, often correlates with a lighter equity weighting due to the ability to secure income through fixed income.
  • This conservative approach can lead to high leftover balances, which may not align with most retirees' goals of maximizing lifetime spending.
  • The goal should be to maximize lifetime spending or giving, not necessarily to leave a large legacy.

    "And one important trade-off to note there is that oftentimes those very conservative spending systems do correlate with really high leftover balances."

Defining Success and Failure [00:19:30]

  • Morningstar defines success as a 90% probability that the portfolio will have at least one dollar remaining at the end of the tested time horizon.
  • This means a 10% chance of failure, which is still a significant risk for some.
  • Flexible spending systems can make it very difficult to achieve a failure rate in Monte Carlo simulations.

    "We use a success rate, we call it, of 90%, which means that in a thousand simulations that we might run on an initial spending of X and an asset allocation of Y and Z, that in 900 of a thousand of those simulations, the portfolio would still have at least a dollar left over in it at the end of whatever time horizon we're testing."

The "Good Enough" Investing Philosophy [00:23:00]

  • Perfection is the enemy of good; the pursuit of an optimal plan is often futile as perfect outcomes are only known in hindsight.
  • A "satisficer" mindset, where one accepts a plan that meets reasonable criteria, is more practical than an "optimizer" mindset.
  • Focusing on "good enough" allows for flexibility and reduces anxiety about making the absolute best decision.

    "And I wish people would all kind of ground themselves in that mindset, but it's an upward climb."

Addressing the Desire for 100% Success [00:28:00]

  • A 100% success rate often necessitates extremely low spending rates that may be unlivable.
  • More sophisticated flexible spending systems, like those used in Income Lab, re-evaluate success rates annually and make adjustments.
  • The impulse to spend less when markets are down is a rare behavioral trait that aligns with portfolio health.

    "The point is that that will lock you into a very low rate of spending, maybe unlivable for a lot of households, that 100% success rate."

Retirement Decisions: Early vs. Later [00:32:00]

  • Younger retirees often prefer to retire early with a lower initial withdrawal rate (e.g., 3%) and ratchet spending up as the portfolio grows.
  • This contrasts with retiring with a higher withdrawal rate (4-5%) and aiming to "die with zero."
  • Flexible systems like guardrails accommodate this by allowing spending increases in good markets, but also require decreases in bad ones.

    "Do you want to retire early and withdraw at something close to 4% to 5% and, you know, die with zero? Or do you want to retire early in your 30s or 40s and withdraw 3% per year but be able to ratchet your spending up as your portfolio grows across time?"

The Value of Time [00:35:00]

  • Beyond investment portfolios, individuals should consider their "time on earth allocations."
  • Spending excessive time optimizing minor investment details detracts from enjoying life and pursuing other valuable activities.
  • Recognizing that life expectancy is uncertain and that time is finite encourages a focus on what truly matters.

    "And to me, it's really valuable to not spend time on things that that really probably won't deliver meaningfully better results over time."

Finding Christine Benz [00:37:00]

  • Christine Benz is a regular contributor to Morningstar.com.
  • Her book is titled "How to Retire."
  • She co-hosts The Long View podcast and is active in the Bogleheads community.

    "So I'm a regular on Morningstar.com. Morningstar is my employer. My book is called How to Retire."

The Bogleheads Community and TIPS [00:38:30]

  • The Bogleheads community, focused on indexing, also exhibits an "optimizer" mindset.
  • They generally favor Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) as a valuable component of retirement planning.
  • The Bogleheads conference sessions are often posted on YouTube, providing accessible educational resources.

    "So the Bogleheads are generally, despite being indexing enthusiasts, there's a big optimizer mindset in the Bogleheads community."

The Endless Complexity of Retirement Planning [00:42:00]

  • Creating a perfect calculator for all retirement scenarios is practically impossible due to the vast number of variables (taxes, asset location, spending, assumptions).
  • Each individual's situation presents unique complexities, making a one-size-fits-all model infeasible.
  • The focus should remain on "good enough" strategies rather than getting lost in the pursuit of unattainable perfection.

    "It's a puzzle that is endlessly complex, but also very simple if you just focus on good enough."

Key Takeaways: Uncertainty and Trade-offs [00:45:00]

  • Retirement decumulation is an uncertain field with no single "right" answer.
  • Decisions involve trade-offs and are informed by individual worldviews and assumptions.
  • Understanding this uncertainty and embracing a "good enough" approach is crucial for making sound retirement decisions.

    "There's no right answer. No one will know until the next 30-year or 60-year time horizon passes."

Other People Also See