El-Sayed DEFEATS Stevens And The Establishment COPES

The Young Turks

59,237 views • 9 hours ago Save 20 min 4 min read

Video Summary

Despite significant backing from the Democratic establishment and over $62 million in funding, progressive candidate Abdul El-Sayeed secured a primary victory in Michigan, defying expectations and media narratives.

Mainstream outlets, including Politico, are being accused of propagandizing the results, framing El-Sayeed's win as a defeat for progressives and a stronger-than-expected showing for his establishment-backed opponent, Haley Stevens. This spin is particularly criticized given El-Sayeed's substantial underdog status, facing a reported 10-to-1 spending disadvantage, with $35 million of Stevens' funding coming from AIPAC. The commentary highlights a perceived disconnect between the political establishment's insulated worldview and the reality on the ground, suggesting a deliberate effort to downplay progressive successes and maintain the status quo.

Short Highlights

Progressive Victory: Abdul El-Sayeed won the Michigan Democratic Senate primary despite predictions and establishment backing for his opponent.
Media Spin: Outlets like Politico are accused of framing the win as a loss for progressives and a strong showing for the establishment candidate.
Financial Disparity: El-Sayeed faced a significant funding disadvantage, reportedly outspent 10-to-1, with $35 million of his opponent's funding from AIPAC.
Establishment Narrative: The establishment's narrative is criticized for being out of touch with reality and for attempting to downplay progressive successes.
Other Progressive Wins: The discussion notes other progressive victories, including William Lawrence and Donovan McKinney, who defeated incumbents.
Identity Politics Accusations: Neera Tanden is criticized for using identity politics to smear progressive candidates who challenge the economic status quo.
AIPAC's Stance: AIPAC acknowledged El-Sayeed's win but vowed to continue efforts to defeat him and other "anti-Israel" candidates in the general election.

Key Details

Establishment Underestimated Progressive Abdul El-Sayeed [0:00]

Abdul El-Sayeed, initially a third-place candidate, defied expectations to win a progressive primary seat against the Democratic establishment.
The establishment's narrative shifted from dismissing his chances to spinning his victory as a loss.

"And of course, as a lot of you saw, he won."

Media Accused of Propaganda and Spin [0:45]

Politico's reporting is highlighted for framing El-Sayeed's win as a "defeat" for progressives, despite his victory.
The media is accused of using a "centrifuge" to spin a devastating loss for the establishment and AIPAC into a win for their candidate.

"We will take a devastating loss for the establishment and for APAC. And we will try to spin it like it's in a centrifuge."

El-Sayeed's Campaign and Projected Victory [1:40]

Public polling and campaign projections indicated El-Sayeed was ahead by double digits, expecting a decisive win.
This victory was seen as crucial for the progressive movement in Michigan and for Democratic prospects in future elections.

"Progressives, sorry, they say public polling in the campaign's closing stretch showed El Said ahead of Stevens by double digits."

Contrasting Media Narratives with Reality [2:30]

The speaker contrasts the media's portrayal of Bernie Sanders' 2016 primary performance with the current narrative around El-Sayeed's win.
Despite winning, El-Sayeed's victory is questioned, with claims that the "progressive wave never materialized."

"The progressive wave never materialized on Tuesday night. How could you say it never materialized? We won."

Politico's Ownership and Influence [3:30]

Julian discusses Politico's ownership by Matthias Doffner of Axel Springer, whose company has a constitutionally mandated recognition of Israel's right to exist.
Doffner's ties to Israel, including receiving the Israeli Medal of Freedom, raise questions about Politico's objectivity.

"So this outlet is purporting to be real news, but they're giving you straight up propaganda, as you said."

Financial Disparity and AIPAC's Role [4:20]

El-Sayeed was outspent approximately 10-to-1, with $35 million of Haley Stevens' $62 million backing coming from AIPAC.
AIPAC's claims of individual donations are dismissed as out of touch with reality, suggesting intentional deception or ignorance.

"35 million of the 62 million behind Haley Stevens came from AIPAC."

Establishment Figures' Reactions and Smears [6:00]

Neera Tanden is criticized for her remarks, which downplay El-Sayeed's win by focusing on perceived blind spots with working-class voters, despite El-Sayeed being a person of color.
Republicans are also employing bigoted attacks, using AI-generated ads to label El-Sayeed as an "Islamist" and "jihadist."

"What I've learned tonight is a lot of pollsters and pundits in the Democratic Party ecosystem are very good at talking to white college educated voters like themselves, and have real blind spots with working class people of all races."

AIPAC's Continued Opposition and General Election Strategy [12:00]

AIPAC acknowledges El-Sayeed's win but states its members are "determined to ensure that voters reject Dr. El Saeed and his radical anti-Israel agenda in November."
AIPAC boasts of 215 pro-Israel candidates advancing to the general election, with a majority of their donors being Republican.

"Our members remain determined to ensure that voters reject Dr. El Saeed and his radical anti-Israel agenda in November."