BOMBSHELL: Alleged Epstein Co-Conspirator REVEALED After Massie Fight

DOJ's Alleged Violation of Redaction Laws [00:00]

• The Department of Justice (DOJ) is accused of illegally redacting names of powerful individuals involved in the Jeffrey Epstein case, beyond the legally permissible reasons of national security and victim identification.
• Congressman Thomas Massie and Roana reviewed unredacted files and highlighted these violations, prompting the DOJ to subsequently unredact some information.
• The law permits redactions solely for national security and victim names, yet the DOJ has allegedly used it to shield the identities of the "rich, the famous, and the powerful."
• A key piece of information revealed is that the DOJ had to unredact an FBI file labeling two individuals as co-conspirators, and tacitly admitted Sultan Ahmed bin Suliam was the sender of a "torture video."

The express purpose of the legislation which uh which permits redactions says you may only redact for national security and victim's names.

Implication of High-Profile Individuals [01:31]

• In just two hours of reviewing unredacted files, six individuals were identified.
• Among those implicated are individuals in high positions within foreign governments and prominent figures.
• The speaker notes that these six are just what was found in a limited review, suggesting more significant names may be hidden within the unreleased files.
• The broader issue is the extensive redaction of files, hindering a full understanding of the case.

We want those names published.

Unredaction of Les Wexner and Sultan Ahmed bin Suliam [02:31]

• Thomas Massie reported that the DOJ unredacted an FBI file naming Les Wexner as a potential co-conspirator in the 2019 child sex trafficking case.
• Wexner, the former CEO of Victoria's Secret, is identified as a significant source of Epstein's wealth and initial entry into high society.
• Sultan Ahmed bin Suliam, CEO of Dubai Ports, is also implicated, with an email confirming his statement: "I loved the torture video."
• The connection between these individuals suggests the sex trafficking aspect of the case is intertwined with intelligence and financial dealings.

Now very specifically what I think is very important perhaps more than anyone is the explicit naming in this case of Lesie Wexter.

DOJ's Defense and the Role of Co-Conspirator Status [06:00]

• The DOJ's defense, as stated by Todd Blanch, claims that victim names were redacted, but Massie refutes this, stating Wexner's name appeared thousands of times.
• Blanch claimed, "The Justice Department is hiding nothing," but Massie counters that Wexner's name was redacted when he found it and only unredacted after his public challenge.
• The key distinction is between general mentions of a person in documents and explicit identification as a "potential co-conspirator" by the government.
• The latter status implies a level of government suspicion and investigation that is significantly more consequential.

It's one thing to have emails about this person going back and forth and, you know, whatever sort of dialogue was going on. It's another thing to specifically know the government identified this wealthy man and benefactor of Jeffrey Epstein over many many years as someone who deserved an investigation as someone who may have been directly implicated in Epstein's crimes.

Horrific Revelations of Underage Victims [08:15]

• Congressman Jamie Raskin also reviewed files and reported mentions of underage girls, specifically ages like 15, 14, 10, and even a 9-year-old girl.
• This contradicts any defense that might focus solely on "barely legal" individuals.
• The gravity of these revelations is underscored by Raskin calling the situation "preposterous and scandalous."
• The British are perceived as taking the scandal more seriously than the U.S. authorities.

I mean, it's an incredibly serious thing when you read through these files and you read about 15year-old girls, 14y old girls, 10 year old girls. I saw mention of a 9-year-old girl uh today.

The Immense Scale of the Cover-Up and Public Pressure [09:37]

• The DOJ is accused of actively covering up information unless explicitly called out.
• Thomas Massie's original tweet about Les Wexner stated the DOJ should unredact the name, to which the DOJ responded by unredacting it, claiming it was a mistake.
• The sheer volume of 3 million unreleased files makes it virtually impossible for individuals like Massie and Raskin, or even their staff, to thoroughly review and identify all improper redactions.
• Public pressure, stemming from the American people's demand for transparency, is seen as the primary driver for the DOJ's reluctant release of information, forcing them to "cave" and provide a "pretense of transparency."

Unless explicitly called out, is covering up for all of these people.