Why the US is deporting so many people
Johnny Harris
1,164,272 views • 2 days ago
Video Summary
The video explores the history and impact of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in the United States, particularly focusing on the surge in enforcement and deportations under the Trump administration. It highlights the complex nature of immigration statuses beyond simple legal or illegal classifications, detailing how historical economic needs for labor, policy changes, and the post-9/11 security focus have shaped current immigration enforcement. The video also debunks the narrative that immigrants, especially unauthorized ones, are a major source of crime, citing studies that indicate the opposite. It concludes by discussing the aggressive tactics and quotas imposed by ICE, the devastating personal consequences for individuals and families, and the administration's efforts to rebrand immigrants as criminals, despite their economic contributions. A particularly striking fact is that studies show undocumented immigrants are half as likely to commit crimes as native-born Americans.
Short Highlights
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is a well-funded agency with a budget around $10 billion annually.
- ICE arrests have significantly increased, with a stated focus on deporting "removable aliens."
- The narrative linking immigrants, particularly unauthorized ones, to crime is largely unsubstantiated by data; studies show undocumented immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than native-born Americans.
- Historical economic demand for labor, particularly in agriculture and service industries, has driven immigration and often led to undocumented populations when legal pathways were insufficient.
- The post-9/11 era saw a shift towards a more militarized and security-focused approach to immigration enforcement, leading to the creation of ICE and expanded detention capabilities.
- Under the Trump administration, ICE implemented aggressive tactics and quotas, leading to increased detentions and deportations, including of individuals with no criminal record and even legal residents.
- The economic reliance on immigrant labor creates a conflict with aggressive deportation policies, as businesses struggle to replace lost workers.
Key Details
ICE Budget and Enforcement Surge [0:05]
- ICE, a US government agency, has a substantial annual budget of approximately $10 billion.
- Recent news highlighted ICE's actions, including detaining around 1,600 migrants and raiding a meatpacking plant, resulting in over 100 detentions.
- ICE's initial goal upon its creation in the early 2000s was to remove all "removable aliens."
- ICE arrests have shown a notable spike since Donald Trump took office.
- The Trump administration framed its deportation surge as a response to crime, focusing on "murderers, drug dealers, violent criminals, and vicious gangs."
- Data analysis shows that ICE arrests include convicted criminals, individuals with pending charges, and a significant number of people with no criminal record, with the latter category showing the steepest increase.
- Future budgets proposed a major infusion of funding for President Trump's deportation agenda, described as the most intense spending spree on immigration enforcement in modern history.
"And a big way that the new Trump administration has sold this surge in deportations is crime."
The Nuances of Immigration Status and Historical Labor Demand [0:49]
- Immigrants are often discussed in binary terms (legal/illegal), but reality presents a spectrum of statuses, including naturalized citizens, lawful permanent residents (green card holders), those with temporary visas, and those without documentation but with government permission (e.g., asylum seekers).
- Historically, particularly in the early 20th century, the US economy, especially in the Western US, relied heavily on seasonal labor from Mexico for agriculture.
- This flow of migrant labor was legal and encouraged for decades until the 1960s when Congress ended the program due to concerns about labor exploitation and its impact on domestic wages.
- The cessation of this legal pathway, while the economic need persisted, led to an increase in undocumented immigration as workers continued to come and stay.
- By the end of the 2000s, over 10 million people were living in the US without legal status, filling essential jobs in agriculture, construction, restaurants, and other sectors.
- Despite their economic importance, these individuals often had no clear path to legal status, creating a situation of limbo.
- The US legal system offers limited pathways for low-wage workers, with doors primarily open for high-wage earners, family sponsorship, lottery, or asylum, but no specific route for the labor demand in sectors like agriculture or hospitality.
"The need for workers for the economy is a persistent theme as in American immigration history."
Post-9/11 Security and the Creation of ICE [1:59]
- The events of 9/11 significantly shifted the national conversation on immigration, linking it directly to security concerns.
- The 19 men responsible for 9/11 were in the US legally, prompting scrutiny of the immigration system's perceived insecurity.
- In response, Congress created the Department of Homeland Security in 2002, dissolving the Immigration and Naturalization Service and establishing Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
- This marked a move towards a more militarized and security-focused approach to immigration enforcement, driven by a desire for increased safety.
- The creation of ICE and expanded detention centers became a significant part of this new era of immigration enforcement.
- The US Constitution's Fifth Amendment guarantees due process for all individuals, meaning even those found to be in the country without authorization are entitled to a trial and a chance to represent themselves.
- Detention centers are intended to hold migrants awaiting hearings, functioning like jails rather than prisons, meaning they are for temporary holding and not punishment.
"The country was reeling after 911 and a more militarized security focused version of immigration, border protection was one of the ways we felt more safe."
Obama's "Deportation Chief" Era and Sanctuary Cities [21:02]
- President Obama's administration, while aiming for immigration reform and a "nation of immigrants," also became known for a significant number of deportations, earning him the nickname "Deportation Chief."
- His focus was on deporting individuals deemed threats to society, such as "felons, not families" and "criminals, not children."
- A primary method for ICE arrests during this period involved individuals already held in local or state jails, with ICE relying on local police to flag undocumented immigrants.
- Over time, some local police departments pushed back, refusing to hold undocumented immigrants longer for ICE, leading to the concept of "sanctuary cities."
- Sanctuary cities, in this context, are places where local law enforcement treats undocumented immigrants like any other resident, not detaining them solely for ICE to pick up, and allowing them to be released if they make bail.
- This cooperation breakdown created mistrust in communities, where undocumented individuals feared local police due to the risk of deportation.
- Donald Trump's presidential campaign heavily targeted immigrants, framing them as criminals, and he won the election, leading to significant changes in ICE's operational approach.
"Felons, not families, criminals, not children."
Trump's Aggressive Enforcement and Legal Challenges [23:42]
- Donald Trump's administration altered ICE's arrest protocols, authorizing them to pick up individuals encountered during operations, not just those in police custody or with prior criminal records. This is known as "collateral enforcement."
- ICE raids became much more visible during Trump's first presidency, with operations targeting various locations and arresting large numbers of people.
- The Trump administration faced numerous legal challenges from the courts regarding its immigration policies, including attempts to enact a "Muslim ban," cut funding to sanctuary cities, and end the DACA program, many of which were blocked.
- These legal setbacks indicated that much of Trump's envisioned immigration crackdown was not legally sound.
- Despite legal obstacles, Trump's policy architects learned from these failures and prepared for future actions.
"In the first Trump administration, they kept losing. They had poorly drafted rules that judges struck down and you learn from failure."
Biden's Border Surge and Trump's 2024 Campaign Narrative [25:34]
- Following Donald Trump's presidency, Joe Biden took office, leading to an increase in migrants arriving at the border, partly due to the perception that a less anti-immigrant president was in power and economic instability in South America exacerbated by COVID-19.
- Many migrants were released into the US pending hearings, while a Trump-era policy of expelling many new immigrants without processing was maintained, leading to repeat border crossings.
- The surge in border arrivals became a central theme for Donald Trump's second presidential campaign, framing it as a "massive invasion."
- Public opinion polls showed a significant increase in skepticism and fear towards legal immigrants by 2024, with a notable rise in the belief that immigrants pose a crime risk.
- The concept of "migrant crime" emerged in public discourse, with sensationalized reports of crimes allegedly committed by immigrants.
"Take a look at that. And then the worst president in the history of our country took over. And look what happened to our country."
Data vs. Sensationalism on Migrant Crime and Mass Deportation Plans [28:06]
- Despite sensationalized news reports, data indicates that undocumented immigrants are significantly less likely to commit crimes than native-born Americans, with studies showing lower rates of incarceration and violent crime.
- Research even suggests an increase in the foreign-born population is associated with a decrease in crime.
- Donald Trump's 2024 presidential campaign centered on the promise of the "largest deportation operation in American history."
- Upon taking office, Trump implemented immediate measures including declaring a national emergency at the border, freezing the refugee program, suspending asylum, reviving an 18th-century law for deportations, and making it easier to deport individuals without due process.
- His administration directed immigration judges to fast-track denials for asylum seekers and rolled back protections like Temporary Protected Status.
- To meet deportation goals, ICE's budget was increased, and a quota system was implemented, requiring thousands of arrests daily.
- This pressure led to increased detentions of individuals without criminal records and a broader net for enforcement, with ICE agents reassigned from other critical law enforcement roles.
"The answer is there is no question that people who are in this country without authorization sometimes commit crimes. But if you look at the data, not the the news stories that are sensational and horrible, but the actual data, you will see something like this."
The Human Cost of Quotas and Economic Disruption [33:11]
- Aggressive enforcement and quotas led to the detention of not only undocumented immigrants but also green card holders, with instances of mistreatment and deportation to countries of origin.
- Daniel, a lawful permanent resident and business owner, was detained and deported due to a decades-old minor offense, highlighting the harsh application of new enforcement policies.
- Detention facilities are described as "wretched places" with poor conditions, leading individuals to accept deportation to escape them.
- The pressure to meet quotas incentivized ICE to increasingly focus on individuals with no criminal record, significantly increasing the number of arrests in this category.
- This aggressive approach conflicted with the economic needs of industries reliant on immigrant labor, leading to widespread anger among business owners and corporations.
- Despite the economic reliance, the administration continued to brand immigrants as criminals and fair game for deportation, regardless of their contributions or lack of criminal history.
"The living conditions were so bad that I basically asked to get deported myself."
Historical Parallels and the Rebranding of Immigrants [40:50]
- The administration's actions involved a significant "rebranding" of immigrants, portraying them as criminals and subject to deportation, regardless of their years of residence, community ties, or economic contributions.
- This tactic of branding outsiders as criminals is not new, with historical parallels dating back to at least 1931, demonstrating a long-standing use of this strategy.
- The video notes that even when the Trump administration's own data indicated that arrests of individuals without criminal records were increasing, the narrative continued to focus on criminals and dangerous individuals.
- The current administration, headed by the son of an immigrant, is directing the government to deport a large number of people who are integral to the economy and the country.
- The aggressive message of "fortress America" and the potential for imprisonment in other countries is making the United States less desirable as a destination, undermining its image as a beacon of freedom.
"The theory that immigration is responsible for crime, that all newcomers should be regarded with an attitude of suspicion, is a theory that is almost as old as the colonies."
Other People Also See