Elon Musk's $1T pay package is 'most absurd pay package in the history of business' investor says
Yahoo Finance
256 views • 21 hours ago
Video Summary
The discussion centers on Tesla's current standing and future prospects, particularly its electric vehicle (EV) business and CEO Elon Musk's controversial $1 trillion pay package. Ross Gerber, CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management, expresses pessimism regarding Tesla's EV growth, believing the company has likely maxed out its sales potential at around 1.9 million units annually, with projections for the next year falling to 1.6 million units. He critiques proposed more affordable models as diminishing product value rather than genuinely increasing affordability. Furthermore, Gerber highlights significant concerns about the functionality and safety of Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, citing personal disappointment and comparing it unfavorably to the performance of autonomous ride-hailing services. He also vehemently opposes Musk's pay package, labeling it absurd and questioning its legality, while predicting its eventual approval due to poor corporate governance. One striking fact is that Gerber's firm, managing $4 billion, holds an $80 million position in Tesla, representing about 2% of their assets
Short Highlights
- Tesla's EV sales potential is believed to be maxed out at approximately 1.9 million units annually, with projections for the next year at 1.6 million cars.
- Affordable models are viewed as a strategy of weakness that diminishes product value, rather than a genuine solution for increasing affordability.
- Full Self-Driving (FSD) is described as an "experiment in disappointment," failing to perform basic tasks reliably without constant human intervention, unlike competitors.
- The $1 trillion pay package for Elon Musk is deemed the "most absurd" in business history, with concerns about its legality and arbitrary vesting terms.
- Gerber Kawasaki, managing $4 billion, holds an $80 million position in Tesla, representing about 2% of their a
Key Details
Tesla EV Business Outlook [00:14]
- The speaker believes Tesla's EV sales have reached their peak potential, estimated at around 1.9 million units per year.
- Projections for the upcoming year suggest a decline, with an estimated 1.6 million cars sold.
- This is significantly below the original plan of over 10 million vehicles annually.
- The speaker criticizes analysts for not incorporating these realities into their growth projections.
Unfortunately, I have to tell you, I think this is as good as it's going to get.
Affordability and Product Value [01:37]
- The concept of "more affordable models" is questioned, with the argument that stripping down a car and selling it for half price doesn't make it affordable but rather diminishes its value.
- This strategy is seen as a sign of weakness, indicating an inability to convince consumers to buy the product at its current value.
- The lack of advertising to create demand and the CEO's public image are cited as contributing factors to the disconnect.
It's not affordable. I mean, if I rip out half the car and sell it for half price, it doesn't make the car more affordable.
Investment Stance and Full Self-Driving Concerns [02:14]
- The speaker has been consistently selling Tesla stock for months, viewing the current situation not as a new opportunity but as a continuation of a long-term selling strategy.
- While acknowledging that some shareholders remain die-hard fans, the firm's position has been reduced, now representing about 2% of their $4 billion in managed assets ($80 million).
- A major concern is the future of Full Self-Driving (FSD), with skepticism about its potential to work as promised, especially with a vision-only approach.
- The speaker contrasts Tesla's FSD performance with companies like Waymo, which are seen as successfully deploying autonomous driving technology.
I'd like to be a bigger believer in Tesla, but I think the bigger issue I have is what's going to happen if full self-driving doesn't work.
Personal Experience with FSD [03:23]
- The speaker, a Tesla owner and Cybertruck driver, describes using FSD daily as an "experiment in disappointment."
- The system frequently requires disengagement and constant human attention, even for short distances.
- This is directly compared to Waymo rides, which provide a seamless and reliable autonomous experience, leading to frustration about unmet promises.
- The speaker has spent tens of thousands of dollars on FSD over the years with unsatisfactory results, leading to a desire for honesty about the technology's current capabilities.
It's like right now when I go home, if I push drive me home and it's about 3 miles, it it just can't do it without me disengaging and I have to pay complete attention the entire time to the vehicle.
Elon Musk's Pay Package and Corporate Governance [04:26]
- The upcoming shareholder vote on Elon Musk's $1 trillion pay package is a significant point of contention.
- Musk's comments on the earnings call described proxy advisory firms (ISS and Glass Lewis) as "corporate terrorists" for their opposition.
- The speaker intends to vote "no" on the pay package, citing a general belief that CEOs are overpaid, but specifically calling Musk's package the "most absurd" ever created.
- Concerns are raised about the legality of the package, particularly the lack of genuine negotiation and the arbitrary nature of vesting terms, predicting further lawsuits.
But this is the most absurd pay package that has ever been created in the history of of business.
Risk of Musk Leaving and Board Responsibility [06:04]
- The speaker dismisses the idea that Musk would leave Tesla if the pay package is not approved, comparing it to an empty threat and noting that his own wealth is heavily tied to Tesla's success.
- The current board is criticized for its lack of independence, being composed of friends and relatives who are "extremely overpaid to go along with everything."
- Despite the absurdity of the pay package, it is predicted to be approved due to this dynamic.
- This situation is labeled as the "worst example of shareholder governance in business history."
So, his whole house of cards is predicated around Tesla being successful. So, he's not going anywher
Other People Also See