IDF Soldier Suggests Israel LET OCTOBER 7 Happen
The Young Turks
370,639 views • 11 months ago Save 5 min 9 min read
Video Summary
The video transcript alleges that Israeli officials possessed detailed knowledge of Hamas's October 7th attack plan a year in advance, citing a New York Times report. This blueprint allegedly outlined a methodical assault designed to overwhelm fortifications, take over cities, and storm military bases, which Hamas reportedly followed with precision. Despite possessing this information, Israeli authorities apparently dismissed the threat as beyond Hamas's capabilities.
Further evidence is presented from an Israeli newspaper, Haaretz, reporting on a never-before-seen IDF document that surfaced in June 2024. This document, based on intelligence from unit 8200, detailed Hamas's operational plans, including specific instructions for taking between 200 and 250 Israeli hostages. This intelligence was reportedly circulated less than three weeks before the attack and brought to the attention of senior intelligence officials, yet was allegedly ignored.
The transcript also highlights testimony from an IDF soldier who suggests Israel may have intentionally allowed the attack to happen. The soldier recounts an unusual order to cease patrols along the Gaza fence until 9 a.m. on the day of the attack, which he found strange as patrols are typically a daily occurrence. This testimony, reported by Israeli media, raises questions about why such intelligence was ignored and whether the Israeli government had a political benefit in allowing the atrocities to occur.
Short Highlights
- Alleged Prior Knowledge: Israeli officials reportedly had a detailed blueprint of the Hamas attack plan over a year before October 7th.
- Ignored Intelligence: A document detailing Hamas's operational plans and hostage numbers was allegedly ignored by senior intelligence officials less than three weeks before the attack.
- IDF Soldier Testimony: An IDF soldier suggests Israel may have intentionally allowed the attack, citing unusual orders to halt border patrols on the morning of October 7th.
- Hostage Numbers: The plan reportedly detailed taking between 200 and 250 Israeli hostages, a number that was subsequently kidnapped.
- Political Benefit: The transcript speculates that the Israeli government may have seen a political benefit in allowing the atrocities to occur.
Key Details
October 7th Attack Foreknowledge [00:00]
- An investigation is ongoing regarding the events of October 7th.
- Soldiers were reportedly told to stand down during specific hours.
- It is suggested that the breakdown was not due to mistakes, implying an "inside thing."
- The speaker has personal knowledge of the border and Israeli security operations.
The events of October 7th are under investigation, with suggestions of an internal breakdown and deliberate actions rather than simple mistakes.
Something bad happened and it was an inside thing.
Hamas Attack Plan Blueprint [01:07]
- Reporting from "the dissident" suggests new testimony from an IDF soldier indicating Israel may have intentionally allowed the October 7th attack.
- This is reported by Israel's Channel 7 News and "the dissident."
- A New York Times piece from November 30th, 2023, titled "Israel knew Hamas's attack plan more than a year ago," is referenced.
- A blueprint reviewed by the Times laid out the attack in detail, which Israeli officials dismissed as aspirational and ignored specific warnings.
Evidence suggests that Israeli officials were aware of Hamas's attack plans over a year in advance, as detailed in a New York Times report, but seemingly disregarded the warnings.
Israel knew Hamas's attack plan more than a year ago.
Hamas Attack Blueprint Details [02:33]
- The New York Times piece indicated Israeli officials obtained a detailed Hamas battle plan for October 7th a year prior to the attack.
- The translated document, reviewed by the New York Times, described a methodical assault designed to overwhelm fortifications, take over Israeli cities, and storm key military bases, including a division headquarters.
- Hamas reportedly followed the blueprint with shocking precision.
- The document called for a barrage of rockets, drones to disable security cameras, automated machine guns along the border, and gunmen to enter Israel via paragliders, motorcycles, and on foot.
- This blueprint was available to Israeli authorities, but they did not prepare for it.
- Experts determined that an attack on that scale was beyond Hamas's capabilities, according to documents and officials.
The detailed Hamas attack blueprint, obtained a year before the event, outlined a precise strategy that was reportedly ignored by Israeli authorities who underestimated Hamas's capabilities.
The document called for a barrage of rockets at the outset of the attack, drones to knock out these security cameras, and automated machine guns along the border, and gunmen to pour into Israel in mass, in paragliders, on motorcycles, and on foot.
New Evidence of Prior Knowledge [04:35]
- A report in the Israeli paper Haaretz in June 2024 revealed another piece of evidence that Israel knew about the attack before it happened.
- This report was titled, "New evidence reveals IDF had detailed prior knowledge of Hamas plan to raid Israel."
- A never-before-seen IDF document surfaced with startling new details of Hamas's operational plans to invade Israel.
- The report outlines that Hamas orders included taking between 200 and 250 Israeli hostages.
- Weeks prior to the attack, the IDF had access to additional evidence that Hamas was planning this attack.
New evidence, including an IDF document, reportedly shows that Israeli forces had detailed knowledge of Hamas's raid plans, including specific hostage numbers, weeks before the attack.
New evidence reveals IDF had detailed prior knowledge of Hamas plan to raid Israel.
IDF Intelligence and Ignored Warnings [05:25]
- A newly surfaced document revealed that Israeli Defense Forces and Israeli intelligence systems had detailed knowledge of Hamas's plan to raid Israel.
- This included the number of hostages to be taken and specific instructions for their treatment.
- The document, based on information from military intelligence's 8200 unit, began circulating on September 19th, less than three weeks before October 7th.
- Its contents were brought to the attention of at least some senior intelligence officials but were apparently ignored.
- The raid targets described in the document closely mirrored the locations hit by Hamas forces on October 7th, including command and control headquarters, base synagogues, squadron headquarters, communications headquarters, and soldiers' quarters.
- The document detailed Hamas's plan to take between 200 to 250 hostages.
An IDF document, circulated less than three weeks before the attack, detailed Hamas's precise plans, including hostage numbers and targets, which was reportedly ignored by senior officials.
The document, which is based on information from military intelligence's 8200 unit, began circulating on September 19th, less than 3 weeks before the October 7th massacre.
IDF Soldier's Testimony on Patrol Stand-Down [07:18]
- Damning testimony from an IDF soldier on duty on October 7th is reported by Israel's Channel 7.
- The soldier, Shalom Shadrit, a Golani fighter, suggests that Israel intentionally allowed the attack to happen.
- At 5:20 a.m. on October 7th, the soldier stated they were playing on their phone when a strange message came from their deputy commander.
- The order given was that there would be no patrols in the Gaza fence until 9 a.m.
- This was unusual, as patrols are a daily occurrence for an operational battalion.
- The soldier questioned why this order was given and why it was being reported for the first time now.
An IDF soldier's testimony suggests the attack may have been allowed to happen, citing an unusual order to cease border patrols on the morning of October 7th, which deviated from standard operational procedure.
"I don't know why, but an order was given that there would be no patrols in the Gaza fence until 9 a.m."
Questions Regarding IDF Complicity and Ignored Intel [09:56]
- Channel 7 asked the IDF soldier why so many IDF officials at posts near the Gaza border were sleeping when October 7th happened.
- The soldier responded that they did not know how to answer this directly, suggesting it's possible patrol guards were told not to wake up.
- The soldier addressed the ignored intelligence, stating it was not a failure of the fighters on the ground but of the high levels in the army.
- They mentioned informing higher-ups a week in advance about intelligence information.
- The transcript questions whether the lives of soldiers are valued by the government.
- It's questioned if the prime minister or the Israeli government cares about the hostages, given the ongoing military activity and blockade.
- It is noted that at least three hostages were shot to death by IDF soldiers.
- The speaker questions how many IDF soldiers have died in what is described as a "genocide" based on an attack that could have been prevented.
The testimony and ignored intelligence point to failures at high levels of the army, leading to questions about the government's priorities, the value placed on soldiers' lives, and the potential for political benefit in allowing the attacks.
It's not a failure on the part of the fighters on the ground, but on the part of the high levels in the army of people who went down to Elliot, even though we informed them a week in advance, that there was intelligence information.
The Greater Israel Project and Political Motivations [12:15]
- Jeremy Scahill's reporting about what the prime minister was doing weeks prior to the October 7th attack is highlighted.
- Two weeks before the attacks, the Israeli leader presented a map at the UN General Assembly depicting a "new Middle East" with Israel stretching from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, erasing Gaza and the West Bank as Palestinian lands.
- This is viewed as a preview of what was to come.
- The speaker questions who cares if innocent Israeli civilians die or if IDF soldiers are forced to carry out atrocities for the "Greater Israel Project."
- It's suggested that the prime minister cares only about himself and conquest, and is achieving his goals due to the support of the US government.
- The speaker criticizes US government officials for serving the Israeli government rather than the American people or the international community.
The "Greater Israel Project" is presented as a potential motivation for the attacks, with the prime minister's actions and pronouncements before October 7th suggesting a long-term expansionist agenda, supported by external political backing.
He was just giving us a little sneak peek, a little preview at what was to come.