A.I. actress controversy
KTLA 5
13,698 views • 10 months ago 4 min read
Video Summary
The emergence of AI-generated actresses is sparking significant debate within the entertainment industry. An example of this is "Norwood," an AI actress created by an AI talent studio, with reports of agents expressing interest in representing her. This development has drawn criticism from human actors and filmmakers who fear AI could displace them.
One filmmaker, who has been vocal about the potential impact of AI, warned about these possibilities years ago. The creator of "Norwood" stated that the AI is intended as a creative tool and not a replacement for human performers, aiming to offer new artistic possibilities. However, past comments comparing the AI's potential to established actors like Scarlett Johansson or Natalie Portman, and highlighting its ability to work endlessly without breaks, have fueled concerns about its role in the industry.
Despite reassurances that the AI is a creative work, the notion of AI actors not being replacements but new tools has been met with mixed reactions. While some see it as an opportunity to explore technological advancements and potentially create better content, others are disappointed, believing the core of entertainment lies in humans sharing human experiences.
Short Highlights
- AI-generated actresses are emerging, with one named "Norwood" reportedly attracting agent interest.
- Concerns are raised about AI actors potentially replacing human performers.
- The creator of "Norwood" describes the AI as a "creative work" and a "new tool," not a replacement for humans.
- Past statements from the creator compared the AI's potential to famous actresses and highlighted its 24/7 availability.
- The industry is divided, with some embracing AI as a technological advancement and others lamenting the potential loss of human storytelling.
Key Details
AI-Generated Actresses Emerge [00:50]
- An AI-generated actress named "Norwood" has been created.
- There are reports of agents showing interest in representing "Norwood."
- This development is causing backlash within the entertainment industry from actors and filmmakers.
The appearance of AI-generated actresses, exemplified by "Norwood," is creating significant controversy, with industry professionals expressing concern over potential job displacement.
SHE SMILES FOR THE CAMERA SHARE STILLS FOR HER NEWS PHOTO SHOOT AND VIDEO FROM HER FIRST ACTING ROLE. BUT CAN YOU TELL NORWOOD ISN'T REAL.
Creator's Stance and Industry Concerns [01:04]
- The creator of "Norwood," Eileen Vandervelden, stated that the AI is not a replacement for humans but a "creative work" and a "piece of art."
- Vandervelden also described the AI as a "new tool."
- Filmmakers and actors have been warning about the potential impact of AI technology for years.
- This AI actress is seen as potentially being able to work 7 days a week, 24 hours a day, and be "triple and quadruple booked."
The creator attempts to frame the AI as an assistive tool, yet its perceived capabilities, like constant availability, fuel anxieties among those in the acting profession.
SHE IS NOT A REPLACEMENT FOR HUMAN BEING, BUT A CREATIVE WORK, A PIECE OF ART I CA I NOT AS A REPLACEMENT FOR PEOPLE BUT AS A NEW TOOL THAT TERM IS AI OBJECTS.
Historical Warnings and Future Predictions [01:22]
- A filmmaker and author has been outspoken about AI technology since the last strike in 2023.
- This individual cautioned about what AI could do, even two years prior to the current situation.
- They predict that this is just the beginning and anticipate an influx of AI-generated content.
The perspective of some industry veterans highlights a proactive concern that the current AI developments were foreseeable and are merely the initial phase of a larger trend.
THIS IS ONE OF THE THINGS I CAUTION SIDE ABOUT WHEN I WAS.
Mixed Reactions to AI in Entertainment [02:13]
- The creator of the AI actress reportedly compared her creation to human actors, wanting her to be the "next Scarlett Johansson or Natalie Portman."
- This idea has drawn mixed reactions.
- Some people are curious about what this technology looks like and if it can create better movies.
- Others express disappointment that the industry is willing to work with "not real people."
- The fundamental principle that humans tell human experiences through art is emphasized.
The debate over AI in entertainment reveals a spectrum of opinions, from embracing technological novelty to defending the irreplaceable value of human connection in storytelling.
WHY NOT YOU KNOW, LET'S SEE WHAT THIS TECHNOLOGY LOOKS LIKE LET'S SEE IF THEY CAN MAKE A BETTER MOVIE THAN. LOT OF THE STUFF THAT'S COMING OUT THESE DAYS NO ONE REALLY ENJOYS WATCHING ANYMORE. SO SHOULD GIVE IT A SHOT. IT'S DISAPPOINTING THING THAT THE INDUSTRY IS WILLING TO WORK WITH. NOT REAL PEOPLE. YOU KNOW. BECAUSE THE WHOLE POINT OF LIKE ARE IN THE YEAR. TV AND STUFF IS THAT. HUMANS ARE TELLING HUMAN EXPERIENCES.