
ICE Is Recruiting, And They Are Trying EVERYTHING
The Young Turks
9,131 views • 28 days ago
Video Summary
The government's recruitment efforts for ICE officers have been highly successful, with over 80,000 applicants for 10,000 positions. These efforts include local ads in cities like Chicago and Denver, attempting to attract local law enforcement with offers of higher pay, student loan forgiveness, and generous benefits, including signing bonuses up to $50,000. The recruitment ads, featuring rhetoric about protecting America and capturing dangerous individuals, have also been criticized for their subtext, suggesting a lack of oversight and constitutional adherence for those joining ICE.
Further expanding these efforts, the agency is seeking approximately 300 new office sites to accommodate over 10,000 new immigration officers and lawyers. This expansion is supported by a significant budget increase, with Congress tripling ICE's enforcement and deportation budget to $29.9 billion and allocating $45 billion for immigrant detention centers. This aggressive expansion and recruitment are viewed by some as a "grift" and a "classic money grab," motivated by greed and racism rather than genuine safety concerns.
The hiring of ICE officers is complex, requiring individuals who can be both tough and, paradoxically, cowardly. The underlying issues of immigration and border security are also critiqued, with suggestions that focusing on employers who hire undocumented workers, rather than just border crossers, would be more effective in stemming the flow. The current approach is described as a "racist scam" that exploits a marginalized workforce to prop up the economy.
Short Highlights
Recruitment Efforts for ICE Officers [00:00]
- The recruitment efforts to hire 10,000 new ICE officers have been extremely successful.
- As of the current reporting, there are over 80,000 applicants for these 10,000 positions.
- This high number of applicants indicates a strong response and support from individuals who want to join the effort.
- A website, join.ice.gov, is promoted for sign-ups and to be part of the team making America safe.
The agency is experiencing significant success in its recruitment drive for ICE officers, with a substantial number of applicants showing a desire to join the ranks. This enthusiasm is being leveraged through a dedicated website for interested individuals to sign up.
Oh, our recruitment efforts to hire 10,000 new ICE officers has been extremely successful. Lawrence, uh, as of today, we have over 80,000 applicants for those 10,000 positions already.
Expanding Mass Deportation Agenda [00:35]
- The Secretary of Homeland Security has been promoting her agency's ongoing efforts to expand and carry out the administration's mass deportation agenda.
- Recent reports highlight the extent to which these efforts have progressed.
- As of a statement made on Tuesday, the number of applications received has risen to over 150,000.
- Over 18,000 job offers have been extended, and the agency still seeks more personnel.
The administration is actively pursuing a mass deportation agenda, with the Secretary of Homeland Security spearheading efforts to expand these operations. The agency has seen a significant increase in applications and job offers, indicating a strong push for personnel.
Um, that's uh your secretary of homeland security over the last few weeks. Uh Christy Gnome has been touting her agency's ongoing efforts to expand and carry out Trump's mass deportation agenda, which she is a big part.
Local Recruitment and Poaching Efforts [01:17]
- ICE is now running local advertisements in cities like Chicago and Denver.
- The goal of these ads is to "poach" local law enforcement officers.
- Similar recruitment efforts have been observed in Los Angeles.
- One voiceover actor was offered an audition for commercials that aimed to entice police officers to leave their jobs for ICE with significantly higher pay and less supervision.
ICE is actively targeting local law enforcement in cities across the country through advertisements designed to recruit them by offering better compensation and less oversight.
As part of IC's latest recruitment efforts, they're now running local ads in cities like Chicago and Denver, trying to poach local law enforcement.
Recruitment Ad Messaging and Incentives [01:46]
- The recruitment ads utilize common messaging about protecting America and capturing "the worst of the worst," including drug traffickers, gang members, and predators.
- Hiring bonuses are offered, reaching up to $50,000.
- Generous benefits are also part of the package.
- A notable incentive offered is the forgiveness of student loan debt for potential recruits.
The recruitment advertisements employ strong rhetoric about national security and offer substantial financial incentives, including significant bonuses and student loan forgiveness, to attract candidates.
The script has all the old chestnuts you might expect from this current administration. how he can protect America, help capture the worst of the worst, drug traffickers, gang members, predators, hiring bonus bonuses up to $50,000, and generous benefits.
Controversial Ad Script and Subtext [02:16]
- A particularly shocking part of the ad script addresses law enforcement directly, referencing their oath to protect and serve.
- It claims that in many cities, "dangerous illegals walk free as police are forced to stand down."
- This subtext is interpreted as suggesting that joining ICE offers a more aggressive and less regulated approach to law enforcement compared to local police departments.
- The ad seems to imply that ICE provides an environment where officers can act with less oversight, without adhering to constitutional limits or accountability for their actions.
A controversial element of the recruitment ads suggests that joining ICE offers a freedom from the oversight and regulations faced by local police, potentially encouraging a more unrestrained approach to enforcement.
Attention law enforcement. You took an oath to protect and to serve, to keep your family, your neighborhood safe. But in too many cities, dangerous illegals walk free as police are forced to stand down.
The "Bully" Interpretation of ICE Recruitment [02:43]
- The ad appears to be communicating that by joining ICE, individuals can become the "bully they've always wanted to be."
- This interpretation suggests a lack of accountability for actions, including potential violence or inappropriate behavior.
- The implication is that there is no oversight within ICE for such actions.
- This prospect is framed as potentially appealing to certain officers who may feel constrained by current police department protocols.
The messaging in the recruitment ads is perceived by some as an invitation to act as an unchecked enforcer, free from the constraints and accountability typically associated with local law enforcement.
But this ad appears to be saying that if you join ICE, you can be the bully you've always wanted to be, and you won't have to answer for not adhering to the Constitution or any violence or inappropriate behavior that might occur while doing the job.
Government's Aggressive Recruitment Tactics [03:01]
- The government is offering significant financial incentives, such as up to $50,000 to sign up, along with health benefits.
- The offer includes equipping recruits with a gun and baton, framing it as an opportunity to be a powerful and uninhibited individual.
- The ads suggest a freedom from the limitations of police department protocols.
- This aggressive approach is exemplified by the use of "Insane Payday" voice actors for commercials, highlighting the seriousness of their recruitment drive.
The government's recruitment strategy for ICE is characterized by substantial financial inducements and the promise of unbridled authority, suggesting a desire to attract individuals seeking an enforcement role with minimal constraints.
Essentially, the government seems to be saying, "Here's up to $50,000 just to sign up. Here are the health benefits. Here's a gun. Here's a baton. Come be the kick-ass man or woman you've always wanted to be with no police department protocol limiting you.
High Budget and Expansion Plans [03:41]
- The recruitment budget is significantly large, much higher than the average rate for TV or radio spots.
- The cost of a single job in this recruitment effort could cover rent for 4 months for some individuals.
- ICE is investing heavily in this recruitment drive, employing a "spend money to make money" strategy.
- The agency is also seeking roughly 300 new office sites to house over 10,000 new immigration officers and lawyers.
ICE is allocating a substantial budget to its recruitment and expansion initiatives, demonstrating a significant financial commitment to increasing its personnel and operational capacity.
The budget is huge, much higher than the average rate for TV or radio spots.
Office Expansion and Procurement Phase [04:00]
- The expansion plan includes roughly 300 new office sites.
- These sites will house over 10,000 new immigration officers and lawyers.
- The new staff will be located in offices across the country, including in "red cities" and "red states" in the South and Midwest.
- Leases for these new offices have not yet been signed, as the initiative is currently in the procurement phase.
The agency is planning a significant national expansion of its office infrastructure to accommodate a large influx of new personnel, with the process still in the early stages of securing locations.
And that's also why they're seeking roughly 300 new office sites to house over 10,000 new immigration officers and lawyers.
Proposed Locations and Budgetary Commitments [04:24]
- Proposed locations for the new offices include major cities in Alabama, Idaho, South Carolina, Florida, and Wisconsin.
- This summer, Congress tripled ICE's enforcement and deportation budget to $29.9 billion.
- Additionally, $45 billion has been pledged for the construction of immigrant detention centers.
- Officials indicate that "money is no object" for this expansion, with costs expected to run into the hundreds of millions of dollars.
The agency's expansion is backed by substantial congressional funding for both personnel and infrastructure, signaling a significant financial commitment to its enforcement and deportation goals.
This summer, Congress tripled ISIS's enforcement and deportation budget to $29.9 billion, and pledged $45 billion for construction of immigrant detention centers.
Critique of Government Spending and Hiring [05:01]
- The speaker criticizes the government's contradictory approach of advocating for budget cuts while simultaneously hiring extensively.
- The term "illegals" is discussed, with a critique of its use, particularly by those who identify as Christian.
- It is suggested that this term is used to describe Christian refugees, and its use implies a disdain for religious texts.
The speaker points out a perceived hypocrisy in government rhetoric regarding budget cuts versus aggressive hiring. They also challenge the use of the term "illegals," associating it with a rejection of religious principles.
Um, so, um, what we're seeing here is, you know, let's cut the government, cut the government, doge, you're fired, don't show up at work, right? Right. And then all of a sudden, let's hire everybody.
The Complex Profile of an ICE Officer [05:28]
- Hiring for ICE is described as tricky, requiring a specific combination of traits.
- The ideal candidate is characterized as a "thug" but also an "unmanly coward chicken."
- This paradoxical profile is necessary for individuals who are expected to wear a mask and abuse vulnerable populations.
- The ideal recruit is also seen as a Christian who disregards the biblical principles of welcoming strangers.
The recruitment process for ICE is depicted as seeking a highly specific and contradictory personality type, one that combines aggression with cowardice, and a disregard for religious tenets of compassion.
And it's tricky hiring for ICE because, you know, it's not easy to find the right man. You got to find somebody who's a thug, but also an unmanly coward chicken.
Addressing Immigration Issues: Employers vs. Border Crossers [05:57]
- If the goal were to stop border crossings, the focus would be on employers who hire undocumented immigrants.
- The majority of undocumented immigrants in the country are present due to overstaying their visas, a fact often overlooked by the media.
- The speaker mentions the presence of around 50,000 Irish individuals in the country without plans for their deportation.
- The proposed solution is to arrest employers who hire undocumented immigrants, suggesting a year in jail for such offenses.
The speaker argues that to effectively stop immigration, the focus should be on employers who hire undocumented workers, rather than solely on border security. They propose stricter enforcement against employers as a solution.
If they wanted border crossings to stop, they would take down the employers if they wanted.
Economic Ramifications of Immigration Policy [06:36]
- The current system creates an "exploitable brown-skinned marginalized workforce" that props up the economy.
- If undocumented immigrants were not hired, the economy would collapse, leading to significant price increases, such as salads costing $75.
- This economic reliance is attributed to white individuals who do not want to pay American workers a living wage.
- The media and Democrats are criticized for not addressing these underlying economic factors, labeling the situation a "racist scam."
The current immigration policies are criticized for creating an exploited labor force that benefits the economy, and the speaker suggests that confronting employers and ensuring fair wages would be more effective than current enforcement strategies.
And we wouldn't have that exploitable brown-skinned marginalized workforce anymore to prop up our economy and the economy would collapse and salads would cost $75.
The Perceived Mistake of Joining ICE [07:15]
- The speaker questions the decision of a police officer to leave a stable job with union protection and a pension to join ICE for a "crusading" role.
- This move is seen as potentially unstable unless ICE offers similar union protections and benefits.
- The speaker believes it is a mistake to leave a secure union job with a pension for what is perceived as a temporary payday.
The decision for experienced police officers to leave secure, unionized positions for ICE is questioned, suggesting it may be a poor long-term career choice without comparable job security and benefits.
I mean, if if like if you're a cop and a stable job to join ICE to do this crusading, I I I don't think you have all your screws tied down because unless ICE is telling me they got a union that's going to make it so that you can't get fired like damn near every single police union in the country,
ICE as a "Grift" and Money Grab [08:00]
- The speaker discusses a previous segment about ICE spending over a million dollars on wrapping their vehicles with a new logo.
- This expenditure leads to the realization that the entire ICE operation is viewed as a "grift" and a "slush fund."
- Contracts for buildings and facilities are suspected to be awarded to individuals connected to the administration, suggesting a way to steal money from the public.
- The underlying motivation is believed to be a "classic money grab" rather than the stated goal of deporting millions of undocumented people.
ICE's extensive spending on initiatives like vehicle branding is interpreted as evidence that the agency operates as a fraudulent scheme, primarily motivated by financial gain and corruption.
And I realized that this thing is just a grift. It's just another slush fund honestly.
The Shared Nature of Law Enforcement and the Appeal of Unrestricted Power [08:56]
- The presumption that police departments would readily rehire officers after an ICE assignment is questioned, implying a shared ethos among law enforcement.
- Officers who leave for ICE are described as those who might have been "cut out for trying to do something a little bit tougher" and desire fewer restrictions on their actions.
- The ads are seen as a "really bad thing," potentially motivated by racism and greed, rather than safety.
- The speaker fears that the current administration's actions are driven by these negative motivations.
There is a suggestion that law enforcement agencies share a common operational philosophy, and that individuals leaving for ICE are seeking less restrictive environments. The speaker expresses concern that the agency's actions are fueled by racism and greed.
You know, the presumption that these police departments wouldn't take these people back once they're done with their ICE assignment is is, you know, like that, of course they would, right?
Public Perception of Crime Policy and Election Impact [10:01]
- The speaker notes that the current approach to crime is not resonating with most Americans.
- Americans do not believe that the administration is doing a good job on crime.
- The deployment of resources to cities is also seen as an unpopular issue.
- The impact of these issues on upcoming midterm elections is considered.
The current administration's crime policies and enforcement strategies are not gaining public favor, potentially impacting their electoral prospects in upcoming elections.
And that this uh deployment to the cities is not working either in terms of being a popular issue.
References to Jeffrey Epstein and Protection of Child Rapists [10:20]
- The speaker suggests mentioning "Jeffrey Epstein's name a few more times" before the end of the show.
- A direct accusation is made that Republicans are proud of protecting child rapists.
- This is framed as Republicans doing a "really good job" of protecting them.
The conversation takes a sharp turn to criticize Republicans for their alleged protection of individuals accused of serious crimes, specifically referencing Jeffrey Epstein and child rapists.
You know, to put a book end on the whole show today, uh you're seeing that it's not washing with most Americans. They're they're finding that they don't think Trump's doing a good job on crime and that this uh deployment to the cities is not working either in terms of being a popular issue. I don't know where he goes. Um we should probably say Jeffrey Epstein's name a few more times before the end of the show.
Related Video Summary
Other People Also See



