Bill Ackman Accused of BLACKMAILING Charlie Kirk

A billionaire pro-Israel financier is accused of intimidating and possibly blackmailing a conservative commentator just a month before the commentator's death. Sources claim the financier convened a meeting where the commentator was pressured for his growing criticism of Israeli influence. The commentator reportedly felt threatened and refused offers of funding and a trip to Israel. The financier denies these allegations, stating the meeting was a convened discussion on various conservative topics. A separate report alleges a $150 million campaign fund against another public figure, with the financier offering a $1 million reward for information leading to an arrest in the commentator's death, a reward that could potentially be paid to the alleged gunman's father.

• A billionaire pro-Israel financier allegedly convened a meeting with a conservative commentator a month before his death, pressuring him over his criticisms of Israeli influence.
• The commentator reportedly felt blackmailed and refused offers of funding and a trip to Israel.
• The financier denies the allegations, stating the meeting was a discussion on conservative topics and that the commentator initiated contact.
• There are reports of a separate alleged $150 million campaign fund.
• The financier offered a $1 million reward for information about the commentator's death, potentially payable to the alleged gunman's father, sparking suspicion of a hush payment.

Related Video Summary

• Israel's Pressure Campaign Against Charlie Kirk (w/ Max Blumenthal)
• BIGOTED Prosecutor Gets Exposed For Letting Alleged CREEP Flee To Israel
• Nun Exposes Christians’ Persecution in Israel
• ICE Is Recruiting, And They Are Trying EVERYTHING

Allegations of Intimidation and Blackmail [0:00]

• A billionaire pro-Israel financier is accused of intimidating and potentially blackmailing a conservative commentator a month before his death.
• Sources report the financier arranged a meeting in the Hamptons where the commentator was pressured for his criticism of Israeli influence in Washington.
• The commentator allegedly left the meeting feeling threatened by Israeli blackmail and contemplating a conversion.

This section outlines the core accusation: that a powerful pro-Israel figure attempted to silence a critical voice through pressure and veiled threats, occurring shortly before the commentator's demise.

"Max Blumenthal says billionaire Bill Aman arranged an intervention in the Hamptons during which sources say he and others hammered Kirk for the conservative leaders growing criticism of Israeli influence in Washington. Kirk came away fretting about Israeli blackmail, sources say as he contemplated a Catholic conversion."

Details of the Hamptons Meeting [01:26]

• The meeting, described as "tumultuous and stormy," was convened in the Hamptons during the first week of August by the billionaire financier.
• The financier, described as "ultra-zionist" and close to Israeli leadership, summoned the commentator along with "vapid, very avaricious conservative influencers."
• The commentator was reportedly "hammered" for allowing critics of Israel, such as Megan Kelly, Tucker Carlson, and Dave Smith, to appear at his events.
• The commentator was planning to host similar figures and had added a prominent critic of Israel to an upcoming event, reflecting his shifting views.

This part delves into the specifics of the alleged intervention, including the location, the attendees, and the primary focus of the pressure exerted on the commentator.

"And Charlie Kirk was, according to one source, hammered by Aman and others for allowing Israel critics, very prominent conservative voices like Megan Kelly, Tucker Carlson, or uh the anti-ionist Jewish comedian Dave Smith to appear at his events."

The Commentator's Reaction and Offers [03:09]

• The commentator reportedly walked away from the meeting feeling that there was an attempt to blackmail him.
• He refused offers of funding and an invitation to travel to Israel to meet with the Israeli leader.
• This refusal was disclosed in the wake of the leader's death, though the initial disclosure was unclear on whether the commentator refused or accepted.

This section details the commentator's immediate aftermath and his decisive rejections of lucrative and influential offers presented during the meeting.

"Charlie Kirk walked away according to one person feeling like there was an attempt to blackmail him. He refused any offers of funding and also refused the offer to travel to Israel and meet with Netanyahu."

The Accused Financier's Denial and Counter-Narrative [07:54]

• The financier has issued a denial of the allegations.
• He claims the commentator contacted him in late May, expressing interest in meeting.
• They met over Zoom on June 11th, where the commentator allegedly explained that young conservatives were growing tired of defending Israel.
• The financier states the commentator suggested convening a group of young conservative influencers to discuss topics, including Israel, to gauge the community's views.

This part presents the financier's official statement, refuting the narrative of intimidation and framing the event as a collaborative discussion initiated by the commentator.

"I connected with Charlie when he DM'd me in late May of this year and expressed interest in meeting me. [...] we just met over Zoom. So he says that on June 11th him and Charlie Kirk met on Zoom and Charlie explained to Bill Aman that conservatives in particular young conservatives were getting tired of defending Israel and that this was very concerning to him."

The Financier's Description of the Hamptons Event [09:09]

• The financier claims the commentator convened the Hamptons meeting, inviting numerous pro-Israel and conservative influencers.
• The event was scheduled for August 4th and 5th, with the financier offering to host and cover costs in Bridgehampton.
• The financier admits to funding the entire convention, stating it was for convenience and ease.
• According to the financier, the commentator and his team put together the agenda, which included topics like the economic future of America and the cultural landscape of dating and marriage, but also "Mdani, the new threat to America."

This section details the financier's version of the meeting's genesis and agenda, emphasizing the commentator's role in its organization and the breadth of topics discussed.

"So he's claiming Charlie Kirk convened this meeting in the Hamptons, which included Charlie, Bill Aman, many other um pro-Israel influencers and other conservative influencers who all convened to this Hampton's meeting. And Bill Aman goes on to say that um they chose the afternoon of August 4th to the afternoon of August 5th for the convening."

Allegations of the Meeting's True Nature [10:03]

• The reporting alleges that the commentator was "blindsided" at the convention, expecting one topic but instead being "bombarded" and feeling "blackmailed."
• Sources describe the event as yelling, screaming, and a "big fiasco," leaving the commentator feeling "defeated" and targeted by "pro-Israel forces."
• The commentator's public statements on Megan Kelly's show the very next day, expressing fear for civilization and the West, are presented as evidence of his distress.

This section reiterates the opposing viewpoint, using witness accounts and the commentator's subsequent public statements to support the claim that the meeting was indeed an aggressive intervention.

"And what is being alleged by the gray zone in Max Blumenthal according to his sources is that Charlie then was kind of blindsided at this convention. He was going there thinking maybe it was about one thing and in reality ended up getting bombarded and black essentially he felt blackmailed and there was like an intervention."

Candace Owens' Response and Counter-Allegations [14:37]

• Candace Owens responded to the financier's threats of a lawsuit, advising him to "check your ego" and dismissing his claims of influence.
• She stated that the financier had time to respond with "receipts" but did not.
• Owens clarified that she stated the commentator felt blackmailed by the funding offer, which he refused, and accused the financier of attempting to "rewrite history."
• She also posed questions about an alleged $150 million fund for an anti-Tucker Carlson campaign.

This segment highlights a public dispute arising from the allegations, with Candace Owens directly confronting the financier and introducing new claims about a potential campaign fund.

"Let's clarify. One, check your ego. I do not need you to make my platform bigger. Don't confuse your mysterious wealth with influence. You were contacted with plenty of time to respond with your receipts and you did not."

Further Details on the Financier and the Reward [16:50]

• A clip identifies the financier as a Wall Street Jewish billionaire with connections to major financial figures and global organizations.
• He is noted for his role in the firing of a university president following an anti-Israel protest and his wife's alleged financial ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
• Following a significant event, the financier reportedly shifted to the Republican party and supported a presidential candidate with a substantial donation.
• The financier offered a $1 million reward for information leading to the arrest of the commentator's assassin.

This part provides a biographical sketch of the accused financier, highlighting his wealth, influence, and perceived political shifts, and introduces a significant reward offer related to the commentator's death.

"Bill Aman is a Wall Street Jewish billionaire. Do you know Do you know that he is friends with Larry Frink, the head of Black Rockck, the largest asset manager in the world, managing 10 trillion dollars in assets?"

The Million Dollar Reward and Suspicion [20:31]

• The financier is reportedly set to pay $1 million to the alleged gunman's father for turning in his son.
• The financier stated he keeps his word and will pay the reward if earned, regardless of the recipient's character, but noted reports of the family potentially waiving the reward.
• This situation is viewed by some as potentially silencing the father or creating a hush payment, especially if the father was involved or negligent.
• The suspicion is that this payment is intended to prevent further investigation into the circumstances of the commentator's death or broader conspiracies.

This section scrutinizes the million-dollar reward, exploring the implications of its potential payment to the father and the suspicions it raises about a possible cover-up or silencing.

"The million dollars that is potentially going to be going to Tyler Robinson's father. So, Bill Aman offered a million dollar reward for whoever would turn in the shooter. And since Tyler's father turned him in, Bill Aman is set to give a million dollars to Tyler Robinson's dad."