Worst Nuclear Accidents in History

Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell

10,717,662 views • 4 years ago

Video Summary

The video dissects the perceived dangers of nuclear energy against actual death tolls from various energy sources. While nuclear energy evokes fear due to past catastrophic accidents like Chernobyl and Fukushima, the direct and long-term death counts are significantly lower than those attributed to fossil fuels. Chernobyl, despite its severity, directly resulted in 31 deaths, with long-term cancer estimates ranging widely but generally lower than some initial pessimistic projections. Fukushima's fatalities were primarily indirect, stemming from evacuation stress. In stark contrast, fossil fuels, particularly coal, are identified as the leading cause of deaths due to air pollution, contributing to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. A striking comparison reveals that for every terawatt-hour of energy produced, coal causes approximately 25 deaths, oil 18, natural gas 3, renewables 1 death every few decades, and nuclear energy in the worst-case scenario, one death every 14 years. One study even suggests nuclear energy has saved 2 million lives by displacing fossil fuels. The video concludes that despite public perception, nuclear energy is among the safest options, and the global focus should be on phasing out fossil fuels to avert millions of annual deaths and mitigate climate change.

A particularly arresting fact is that by displacing fossil fuels, nuclear energy is estimated to have saved 2 million lives between 1971 and 2009.

Short Highlights

Nuclear energy is perceived as dangerous, but its direct death toll is low, with Chernobyl causing 31 direct deaths and Fukushima's fatalities mostly indirect.
Long-term death toll estimates from Chernobyl vary, with the WHO estimating around 4,000, while more pessimistic studies project up to 60,000 by 2065.
Fukushima's radiation-related deaths are estimated to be between none and 1,000, with only one confirmed worker death from radiation-induced lung cancer by 2018.
Hydropower has been the most fatal in terms of accidents, with the 1975 Banga hydroelectric dam failure causing an estimated 85,000 to 240,000 deaths.
Fossil fuels are the leading cause of environmental-related deaths, responsible for 4 million deaths annually due to air pollution, and an estimated 100 million in the past 50 years.
Deaths per terawatt-hour: Coal causes 25 deaths, oil 18, natural gas 3, renewables 1 death every few decades, and nuclear energy 1 death every 14 years (worst-case).
Nuclear energy has potentially saved 2 million lives by displacing fossil fuels and is a valuable low-carbon option amidst climate change concerns.
Replacing nuclear energy with fossil fuels, as seen in Germany, leads to avoidable deaths from increased air pollution.

Key Details

Perceived Danger of Nuclear Energy [00:01]

Nuclear energy is often associated with danger due to its use of "ancient and dangerous minerals" and the creation of "horribly toxic elements."
This perception stems from the fear of radiation escape, which has historically caused fatalities.

"nuclear energy creates an uneasy feeling of danger for many people ancient and dangerous minerals are concentrated to awaken seemingly unnatural Powers creating horribly toxic elements that if they escape can and have killed people in horrible ways"

Nuclear Accidents and Death Tolls [00:26]

Since 1951, there have been approximately 30 reported nuclear accidents globally, most of which were minor.
Chernobyl (1986) is considered the worst nuclear accident due to old reactor technology, poor emergency preparedness, and a slow, image-conscious government response.
Directly, Chernobyl caused 31 deaths. The controversy lies in estimating long-term deaths from radiation-induced cancer, with estimates ranging from up to 60,000 (European Green Party study) to around 4,000 (WHO).
Fukushima Daiichi (2011) had better technology, security, and a faster response. Its current death toll is 573, with these deaths being indirect consequences of evacuation stress, primarily affecting older populations.
Long-term radiation death estimates for Fukushima range from none to about 1,000. An increase in thyroid cancer in children has been observed, linked to increased screening rates.
By 2018, only one confirmed death among workers was attributed to radiation-induced lung cancer.

Comparison with Renewable Energy and Hydropower [02:53]

Renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal primarily cause deaths during construction and maintenance.
Hydropower, the major player in renewables, has been the most fatal in terms of accidents, with hundreds of thousands of deaths in the last half-century.
The 1975 Banga hydroelectric dam failure in China, similar to Chernobyl in its technological and management failures, caused an estimated 85,000 to 240,000 deaths due to catastrophic flooding.

Fossil Fuels: The True Killer [04:14]

Fossil fuels are identified as the "real killer" energy source, causing deaths that dwarf those from nuclear and renewable sources.
Burning fossil fuels releases gases like ozone, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen dioxide, causing respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.
Fine particle pollution from fossil fuels (PM2.5) can penetrate deep into the lungs, increasing the risk of lung cancer, stroke, and heart disease.
Fossil fuel air pollution is the number one cause of environmental-related deaths, accounting for significant percentages of lung cancer, lower respiratory infections, stroke, ischemic heart disease, and COPD.
Outside air pollution from fossil fuels contributes to an estimated 4 million deaths annually.
The gradual nature of damage caused by air pollution makes it difficult for the human brain to perceive the scope of the problem.
Collectively, air pollution from fossil fuels is estimated to have caused around 100 million deaths in the past 50 years.

Deaths Per Energy Unit Comparison [06:15]

Comparing death rates per terawatt-hour (TWh) produced:
- Coal: 25 deaths/TWh
- Oil: 18 deaths/TWh
- Natural Gas: 3 deaths/TWh
- Renewable Energy: 1 death every few decades/TWh
- Nuclear Energy (worst-case): 1 death every 14 years/TWh
One study indicates nuclear energy saved 2 million lives between 1971 and 2009 by displacing fossil fuels.
Even with pessimistic estimates, nuclear energy is one of the safest forms of energy generation.

The Nuclear Waste Debate and Policy Implications [07:19]

A key argument against nuclear power is nuclear waste and the lack of long-term storage solutions.
Proponents argue storing waste is safer than inhaling poisonous gases from fossil fuels and promoting climate change, especially while renewables cannot meet global demand.
Replacing nuclear energy with fossil fuels (e.g., Germany and Japan's phase-outs) has led to increased air pollution and avoidable deaths, with Germany experiencing an estimated 1,100 avoidable deaths per year due to its nuclear phase-out and increased coal use.

"the one thing we should strive to get rid of as quickly as possible of fossil fuels to prevent the deaths they cause each year and to slow down climate change regardless of how much you personally care about climate change issues or which energy source you favor saving millions of lives should be something we can all agree on"