‼️😂🎤🔥HE CAME TO FINISH ISLAM, BUT ENDED UP FINISHING HIS OWN CAREER!! *MUST WATCH* @syfetalk

Refuting Alleged Quranic Errors [00:00]

• The speaker begins by stating their intention to refute five points made by another individual claiming errors in the Quran.
• The underlying belief is that the Quran is 100% correct and divinely inspired, while the Bible contains mistakes.
• The speaker notes that similar refutations have been done by others, and this video will chime in and give credit to prior work.

Alhamdulillah. As Muslims, we're going to hit every single point that he brings. And you will see by the will of Allah subhana wa ta'ala that everything that he's trying to use to discredit Islam will end up showing the miracle of Islam.

Can God be Lower Than Angels? [01:32]

• The initial point of contention is whether God can be lower than angels, a question posed to a Christian street preacher who answered no.
• The preacher's reasoning was that God created angels, so He could never be lower than them.
• A verse from Hebrews 2:9 is presented, stating Jesus was "made a little lower than the angels."
• The speaker clarifies that this verse refers to Jesus humbling himself and taking on flesh, not God inherently being lower than angels.
• The speaker's core question remains: "Can God ever be lower than angels?" and the answer provided by the speaker is no, as God is by definition the greatest and most high.

The question I asked is, can God ever be lower than angels? And the Christian street preacher came back and said, nope. God created angels. He could never be lower than angels.

Refuting the "Ezra is the Son of Allah" Claim [05:52]

• A claim is made that the Quran states, "The Jews say Ezra is the son of Allah" (Surah 9:30), and this is presented as a mistake because Jews supposedly never believed this.
• The speaker counters by citing Jewish rabbis and scholars who confirm that in certain times, there were Jews who believed God had a son.
• Genesis 6:2 and 6:3 are referenced, speaking of "sons of God" and "daughters of men," with commentators noting interpretations that could include pious people or angels.
• Rabbi Ben Abrahamson is cited, who believes an individual named Nahima Hos was called the "son of God" by certain Jewish groups in Persia around 614 CE.
• Rabbi Tovia Singer is also quoted, acknowledging a "sect of Jews" who held the "heretical belief that Ezra was the son of God."
• The Quran's statement is interpreted as referring to a specific group of Jews during the time of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), not a universal Jewish belief.

So the the Islamic uh commentators on this both old and more recently um all the consensus is is right down the line. Jews don't believe this. There was either a a sect of a few Jews who held this belief and that would have been heretical.

The Joseph and Silver Coins Misconception [14:14]

• The Quranic verse in Surah Yusuf (chapter 12) mentioning Joseph's brothers selling him for "a few silver coins" is challenged, with the claim that coins were invented over a thousand years after Joseph's life.
• The speaker explains that the Arabic term "dirham" in this context refers to a unit of silver by weight, not necessarily minted coins, which aligns with pre-coin economies.
• The Bible's account in Genesis 37:28 mentions Joseph being sold for "shekels of silver."
• The speaker points out that "shekel" also originally referred to a unit of weight, similar to "dirham," and argues that if the Quran is wrong for using "dirham," the Bible is also wrong for using "shekel."
• Christian study Bibles are cited, providing timelines that show the period of Joseph predates the invention of shekel coins.

The problem is that coins wouldn't be invented until over a thousand years after Joseph's life. author of the Quran didn't realize this, made a mistake.

Quranic Description of Embryological Development [19:13]

• The Quranic description in Surah Al-Mu'minun (23:12-14) of human development in the womb is presented as sequential: a lump of flesh, then bones, then bones clothed with flesh.
• The claim is made that this is incorrect, as bone and muscle tissue form concurrently.
• The speaker argues that the Quranic description is accurate when considering the stages: cartilage forming into bones, and then flesh (muscle) developing around them.
• The Arabic conjunction "fa" (then) is explained as indicating sequence with immediacy, not necessarily the completion of one phase before the next begins.
• Scientific papers and the testimony of Dr. Keith Moore, a professor of anatomy and embryology who became Muslim after studying the Quran, are used to support the Quran's detailed and accurate depiction of embryonic stages.

Allah subhana wa ta'ala is describing the stages of the embryo. Yet this guy doesn't see it and the miracle in this verse but claims there is a mistake.

The Alexander the Great Claim [33:39]

• A criticism is leveled that the Quran portrays Alexander the Great (Dhul-Qarnayn) as a monotheist, while he was a Greek pagan who believed in multiple gods.
• The speaker refutes this by stating that Muslims do not consider Alexander the Great to be a prophet or a monotheist in that sense.
• Scholars have clarified that the figure in Surah Al-Kahf (18) is not necessarily Alexander the Great but a righteous ruler with a similar name.
• The speaker notes that this point has already been refuted in previous videos.

Barn is not Alexander though not great. That's it

The Crucifixion of Jesus and Bible Preservation [35:27]

• The claim that the Quran claims Jesus was never crucified is presented as historically inaccurate.
• The speaker quotes historian Bart Ehrman, who states the crucifixion of Jesus is one of the most certain facts of history.
• However, the speaker then uses Ehrman's own work and statements to argue against the Bible's reliability and preservation.
• Ehrman, who was a former evangelical scholar, is shown to have concluded that the Bible has inconsistencies and contradictions due to its transmission history and lack of original manuscripts.
• The speaker highlights Ehrman's view that the Quran has been faithfully transmitted, while the Bible has not, and that the Quran's manuscripts are consistent, unlike the Bible's.
• Further arguments are presented using evangelical Christian scholars who admit to scribal errors and hundreds of thousands of textual variants in the Bible, suggesting its corruption and lack of perfect preservation.
• The existence of multiple biblical canons (Protestant, Catholic, Orthodox, etc.) and lost books (e.g., Gospel of Mary Magdalene, Gospel of Judas) are cited as evidence of the Bible's inconsistent and evolving nature.

The person you're quoting as an authority from your own words is telling you that your Bible is corrupted and that corruption is not found in the Quran.